|
View Poll Results: What do you think | |||
Its a great idea! | 1 | 3.13% | |
Its a good idea with some changes? | 2 | 6.25% | |
You would still play but you'd play any Pvp at this point? | 4 | 12.50% | |
Better ideas exist. | 25 | 78.13% | |
Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
||||
|
Quote:
Release all Race/Class Diety-combos and the problems will solve itself, and if you people whine about the RP-aspect; Would you really call FFA a better solution? | |||
|
#22
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that with two teams, the balance of power between them is likely to be more similar than with three. | ||||
|
#23
|
|||
|
see, i can live with a bad post that can explain itself.
and i agree your right, teams would only have a few dozen ppl prolly and be spread too thin. a buddy and i thought the teams were balanced but thanks. still really hype about whatever they decide to do. people who mass down rate every post i have to piss me off i dont care. its kinda hard to get pissed when i get laid. and assuming you have time to cause drama (mind you a game is supposed to take your mind away from that. you prolly haven't been in years. you better hope for a pvp server, because raping your fellow man-nerd ass if about as close as your going to get. so i guess i can grant an exemption to your unexplained bitterness? | ||
|
#24
|
|||
|
what year is the pvp server launching again? i forgot. like 2016-17? gives us plenty of time to get our eq3 and eq4 fixes
| ||
|
#25
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#26
|
|||
|
FFA +8/-8, 1 item loot(-bags/contents, -weapons in hand/range, -no drop) + all currency on corpse
| ||
Last edited by Blingx; 04-22-2011 at 07:20 PM..
Reason: on corpse~
|
|
#27
|
|||
|
i lol'd
__________________
| ||
|
#28
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#29
|
|||
|
once again teams i dont really have a problem with...but editing the already created good vs evil is dumbing it down even more. just let it be ffa.. or good vs evil. we dont have to come up with even more ideas to add. just let it be simple. its a simple game..and its been fun that way
| ||
|
#30
|
||||
|
Quote:
During period one the strength between teams are estimated as; Team 1: 45% Team 2: 30% Team 3: 25% Therefor maybe team 2 and 3 wont be as aggressive towards one another as they would be towards team 1. X months expires and y events happen (Mainguild on team1 disbands etc) and now the powerdistribution is the following; Team 1: 30% Team 2: 50% Team 3: 20% Now team 1 and 3 may start work together more against team 2 etc... Though this may be wishful thinking I'd rather allow the possibility of these kinds of shifts in power occurring rather then making it two teams where one potentially just rapes the other. | |||
|
|
|