Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-08-2018, 08:01 AM
raato raato is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 142
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kluwen1 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Raato would you care to cite some specific examples of Aftermath cheating and breaking rules??
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=287229
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=284291
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=280607
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=269930
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=268709
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=261899
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=253736

And this is only to scratch the surface. We all know ALOT of the shenanigans go unpunished, because it is usually very hard to prove that other party has been cheating or because some technicality in ruleslawyering.
__________________
  #2  
Old 04-08-2018, 08:32 AM
raato raato is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 142
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kluwen1 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Ok let me rephrase what specifically has AM done to you that has led you to that conclusion.
I only got old examples since I don't raid much on P99 anymore, because the rules at their current state allow edge to people who are willing to cheat and break the rules so I rather play on server without any raiding rules.

But there was this CT some time ago when you could still kite trash outside of leashing range while killing CT and after CSG engaged CT and had kite under control AM members used bladestoppers and mallets etc. to overagro mobs from CSGs kite to bring them close enough to CT to get CSG raid trained. AM didn't eat punishment for it, eventho server staff agreed that you had wronged, but this rule change went in instead: "Removed: All bits dictating what a concession must be, and all bits stating that they must be accepted.". Because at that time it was common strategy that A/A did some very shady shit to get "wins" and when you got caught you only lost 1 mobs loots, since concessions must have been accepted if it was offered.

Then there was one time in ST when MOTG and Prog were up and AM pulled MOTG first kiting trash around in the big room and you kept the kite going eventho you didn't have to anymore (I understand that you were just prepping to pull Prog next), then CSG went ahead and pulled Prog and the moment our puller entered big room your guys dropped their kite on top of our puller to get him killed and making us fail the pull. Our pullers werent frapsing, so there was no proof what had happened.

And this is just couple examples, I think I can manage to remember few more if you want.
__________________
  #3  
Old 04-08-2018, 09:30 AM
Phatez Phatez is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 397
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raato [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I only got old examples since I don't raid much on P99 anymore, because the rules at their current state allow edge to people who are willing to cheat and break the rules so I rather play on server without any raiding rules.

But there was this CT some time ago when you could still kite trash outside of leashing range while killing CT and after CSG engaged CT and had kite under control AM members used bladestoppers and mallets etc. to overagro mobs from CSGs kite to bring them close enough to CT to get CSG raid trained. AM didn't eat punishment for it, eventho server staff agreed that you had wronged, but this rule change went in instead: "Removed: All bits dictating what a concession must be, and all bits stating that they must be accepted.". Because at that time it was common strategy that A/A did some very shady shit to get "wins" and when you got caught you only lost 1 mobs loots, since concessions must have been accepted if it was offered.

Then there was one time in ST when MOTG and Prog were up and AM pulled MOTG first kiting trash around in the big room and you kept the kite going eventho you didn't have to anymore (I understand that you were just prepping to pull Prog next), then CSG went ahead and pulled Prog and the moment our puller entered big room your guys dropped their kite on top of our puller to get him killed and making us fail the pull. Our pullers werent frapsing, so there was no proof what had happened.

And this is just couple examples, I think I can manage to remember few more if you want.
I guess this is completely off topic but I genuinely am curious about this. If someone is kiting 4+ mobs at 100% hp are you not allowed to rip those mobs off them? I was under the impression you are. If a bard is kiting all of fear is another bard allowed to bladestopper them to rip the kite and bring the mobs in for AoE? Not sure...
  #4  
Old 04-08-2018, 01:46 PM
Fragged Fragged is offline
Fire Giant

Fragged's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 616
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raato [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I only got old examples since I don't raid much on P99 anymore, because the rules at their current state allow edge to people who are willing to cheat and break the rules so I rather play on server without any raiding rules.

But there was this CT some time ago when you could still kite trash outside of leashing range while killing CT and after CSG engaged CT and had kite under control AM members used bladestoppers and mallets etc. to overagro mobs from CSGs kite to bring them close enough to CT to get CSG raid trained. AM didn't eat punishment for it, eventho server staff agreed that you had wronged, but this rule change went in instead: "Removed: All bits dictating what a concession must be, and all bits stating that they must be accepted.". Because at that time it was common strategy that A/A did some very shady shit to get "wins" and when you got caught you only lost 1 mobs loots, since concessions must have been accepted if it was offered.

Then there was one time in ST when MOTG and Prog were up and AM pulled MOTG first kiting trash around in the big room and you kept the kite going eventho you didn't have to anymore (I understand that you were just prepping to pull Prog next), then CSG went ahead and pulled Prog and the moment our puller entered big room your guys dropped their kite on top of our puller to get him killed and making us fail the pull. Our pullers werent frapsing, so there was no proof what had happened.

And this is just couple examples, I think I can manage to remember few more if you want.
Raato The reason I specifically asked you if you wanted us to concede the loot that day was because we had spoken with the GMs about your constant false accusations and they were ready to suspended you for crying wolf. So I was just waiting for you to say the magic words. Lucky for your guild that you didn't.
  #5  
Old 04-08-2018, 06:12 PM
Maner Maner is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 571
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raato [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I only got old examples since I don't raid much on P99 anymore, because the rules at their current state allow edge to people who are willing to cheat and break the rules so I rather play on server without any raiding rules.

But there was this CT some time ago when you could still kite trash outside of leashing range while killing CT and after CSG engaged CT and had kite under control AM members used bladestoppers and mallets etc. to overagro mobs from CSGs kite to bring them close enough to CT to get CSG raid trained. AM didn't eat punishment for it, eventho server staff agreed that you had wronged, but this rule change went in instead: "Removed: All bits dictating what a concession must be, and all bits stating that they must be accepted.". Because at that time it was common strategy that A/A did some very shady shit to get "wins" and when you got caught you only lost 1 mobs loots, since concessions must have been accepted if it was offered.

Then there was one time in ST when MOTG and Prog were up and AM pulled MOTG first kiting trash around in the big room and you kept the kite going eventho you didn't have to anymore (I understand that you were just prepping to pull Prog next), then CSG went ahead and pulled Prog and the moment our puller entered big room your guys dropped their kite on top of our puller to get him killed and making us fail the pull. Our pullers werent frapsing, so there was no proof what had happened.

And this is just couple examples, I think I can manage to remember few more if you want.

You have any evidence of the CT encounter?

So you actualiy expected another guild to kite all the adds for you while you pulled past them?
  #6  
Old 04-08-2018, 08:03 AM
Pheer Pheer is offline
Fire Giant

Pheer's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 858
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kluwen1 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Raato would you care to cite some specific examples of Aftermath cheating and breaking rules??
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...archid=8848660

please tell me that even you arent dumb enough to pretend you guys have never broken a rule kluwen
__________________
  #7  
Old 04-08-2018, 08:22 AM
Linksfather Linksfather is offline
Aviak

Linksfather's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Your mom
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BirryDaKir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This all seems rather cruel to us average players. Feel like I’m being stringed along with a hope of these suspensions ending. Wish they would have just said the 40 day ban was coming immediately after the 30 day ban. Not sure what the reasoning for this is, but I’m just trying to raid and have fun. Oh well, back to playing alts and killing Lodi for 40 days, then maybe 50 more days. If the GMs want is done it would be more humane to just say so.
It’s your leaderships unwilling to see past their own pride not you or your members. Your leadership doesn’t care about consequences you have to eat.
__________________
  #8  
Old 04-08-2018, 12:50 PM
BirryDaKir BirryDaKir is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Here and there
Posts: 76
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rivera [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

lmao, or you could go outside for once...
Was meant as a joke, but fair point lol
__________________
<Tempest> Birrydakir, Raugers, Doobis, Bluecurry and friends
  #9  
Old 04-08-2018, 02:03 AM
branamil branamil is online now
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 812
Default

At first I was thinking that if the point of suspensions is deterrent, then this suspension is kinda pointless and excessive, since the incident occurred BEFORE their last 30 day. You can't very well deter someone from doing something in the past.

I can only assume that the GMs considered this and did it anyways in light of their recent Vulak foul play and assumed they learned nothing. They must be very very very strongly hinting that awakened needs to disband and reform under different leadership without actually forcing them to.
  #10  
Old 04-08-2018, 02:05 AM
Legidias Legidias is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,681
Default

All this whining when the simple solution is to not be an ass and train people. 0 sympathy.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.