![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=284291 https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=280607 https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=269930 https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=268709 https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=261899 https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=253736 And this is only to scratch the surface. We all know ALOT of the shenanigans go unpunished, because it is usually very hard to prove that other party has been cheating or because some technicality in ruleslawyering.
__________________
| |||
|
#2
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
But there was this CT some time ago when you could still kite trash outside of leashing range while killing CT and after CSG engaged CT and had kite under control AM members used bladestoppers and mallets etc. to overagro mobs from CSGs kite to bring them close enough to CT to get CSG raid trained. AM didn't eat punishment for it, eventho server staff agreed that you had wronged, but this rule change went in instead: "Removed: All bits dictating what a concession must be, and all bits stating that they must be accepted.". Because at that time it was common strategy that A/A did some very shady shit to get "wins" and when you got caught you only lost 1 mobs loots, since concessions must have been accepted if it was offered. Then there was one time in ST when MOTG and Prog were up and AM pulled MOTG first kiting trash around in the big room and you kept the kite going eventho you didn't have to anymore (I understand that you were just prepping to pull Prog next), then CSG went ahead and pulled Prog and the moment our puller entered big room your guys dropped their kite on top of our puller to get him killed and making us fail the pull. Our pullers werent frapsing, so there was no proof what had happened. And this is just couple examples, I think I can manage to remember few more if you want.
__________________
| |||
|
#3
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#4
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#5
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
You have any evidence of the CT encounter? So you actualiy expected another guild to kite all the adds for you while you pulled past them? | |||
|
#6
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
please tell me that even you arent dumb enough to pretend you guys have never broken a rule kluwen
__________________
| |||
|
#7
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#8
|
|||
|
![]() Was meant as a joke, but fair point lol
__________________
<Tempest> Birrydakir, Raugers, Doobis, Bluecurry and friends
| ||
|
#9
|
|||
|
![]() At first I was thinking that if the point of suspensions is deterrent, then this suspension is kinda pointless and excessive, since the incident occurred BEFORE their last 30 day. You can't very well deter someone from doing something in the past.
I can only assume that the GMs considered this and did it anyways in light of their recent Vulak foul play and assumed they learned nothing. They must be very very very strongly hinting that awakened needs to disband and reform under different leadership without actually forcing them to. | ||
|
#10
|
|||
|
![]() All this whining when the simple solution is to not be an ass and train people. 0 sympathy.
| ||
|
![]() |
|
|