![]() |
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
Also, what is your word limit? Dang. I thought I was pretty concise.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
ah i read it on mobile so it looked longer at first
can anyone recommend some good pornography? | ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
mad respect for your good tastes | |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Willfight 60 Warrior Stjoan 60 Cleric Drunkyn 60 Monk Shinken 52 Vox Monk | |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
|||
|
Damn OP, in high school you were the man OP.... What the fuck happened to you??
__________________
Willfight 60 Warrior Stjoan 60 Cleric Drunkyn 60 Monk Shinken 52 Vox Monk | ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
1: We never pretended to be camping the gnoll. We openly admitted that we engaged the gnoll at spawn because it was the only legal move we had to try and get a chance at Lodi. This was the first thing said to Sirken from BG.
(You had not killed the gnoll before, therefore it was an open camp as far as camp rules are concerned) 2: We engaged the gnoll first, I have the logs of the encounter and of our conversation with Sirken as proof. It doesn't matter that we weren't there for the gnoll. We made a strategic decision based on what was available. You acknowledged to Sirken that you aren't allowed to charm an engaged mob. (You also gave 2 separate reasons at 2 separate times during our conversation with Sirken as to why you were stalling) 3: Called out in OOC that Charming an engaged mob is considered KS, you did not respond. I was left with only one recourse without risking our group getting a ban by interfering and that was to petition. 4: You weren't even in zone during spawn because we had someone there camping SF at spawn. So don't pull the camp the mob card. 5: You got outplayed. I'm sorry you feel wronged but it was a strategic maneuver, the same as a a leap frog. The game is meant to be competitive in times like this. We came in and saw a weakness in your strategy and we monopolized that weakness. From the very beginning we admitted that we engaged the gnoll to get a chance at Lodi as your shaman was seconds from death until you charmed (an engaged mob that was not going to be alive much longer) and the gnoll ran over to assist. As said after the GM ruling, it was nothing personal and is a highly contested mob. Just as with any contested mob everyone wants to win. We did nothing wrong, even after you charmed our engaged mob we were told by leadership to stand down and not interfere. Next time a call goes out in OOC in regards to something you have just done, try responding and a GM won't have to be involved. We could have worked something out possibly. It's a shame it came to that instead of you just admitting that you were outplayed and giving kudos on what was a smart move. I would have, but of course when I go to Lodi on my enchanter I charm the gnoll before spawn/engage because it's just that easy for someone to throw your strategy right out the window. At the end of the day, it's a game. Don't get your feelings hurt over it. We felt that Sirken should have allowed you two a chance at Lodi without the gnoll and we would have accepted it if you two could have pulled it off. Hell, I would have applauded you both! | ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Quote:
Code:
[Sun Oct 08] AGGuy says out of character, 'what's this now?' [Sun Oct 08] Grizlin Bloodfang tells you, 'Attacking Lodizal Master.' [Sun Oct 08] AGGuy says out of character, 'some interfering/>' [Sun Oct 08] BGDude1 says out of character, 'KS'n also' [Sun Oct 08] BGDude1 says out of character, 'tsk tsk' [Sun Oct 08] BGDude2 says, 'i killing that need it ' [Sun Oct 08] BGDude2 says, 'i woz killing Grizlin Bloodfang' [Sun Oct 08] You say, 'you can get him afterwards' [Sun Oct 08] BGDude2 says, 'U KS my MOB>>' [Sun Oct 08] You say, 'it's not dead' [Sun Oct 08] BGDude1 says out of character, 'enjoy it while it lasts, can't charm an engaged mob. It's a KS' [Sun Oct 08] BGDude2 says, 'U KS my MOB>> Grizlin Bloodfang i woz killing ' [Sun Oct 08] BGDude2 says, 'KS is KS >' Quote:
Quote:
Logs from my FTE listener: [Sun Oct 08] Lodizal engages Grizlin Bloodfang! [Sun Oct 08] Lodizal tells you, 'You got next bruh. GL and thx!' Quote:
I would always agree when someone says that it's not OK to charm a mob that is obviously engaged, this is common knowledge. That wasn't really the case here. Enchanter was far enough away that melee animations are not drawn on the client. She thought you guys were maybe going to charm the mob for yourselves. If you had done that, she'd have asked me what to do next and I'd have told her to just charm something else. But instead you guys just acted like you wanted to kill him for loot or exp... which you would have been welcome to only a few minutes later when we were finished with him. Quote:
AGGal says, 'we were only stalling because Lodizal had killed the gnolls. We were waiting for them to respawn' This was an unfortunate choice of words on my wife's part. She's a bit of a noob. She should have just said that it was taking us longer than usual to get DPS rolling. [xx:16:51 2017] Lodizal engages AGGuy! [xx:20:12 2017] Lodizal yawns. [xx:21:24 2017] BGDude1 says out of character, 'can't stall it buddy' [xx:21:53 2017] Auto attack is on. This is not too bad by current standards. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|