America Vs China

[Beastro]

Originally Posted by mitic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

china and usa would kill each other and austria emerge as the new global power

obv~

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Damn bullpups, keep those AUGs in Counter Strike.

[TigerBloodz]

China may have the numbers, but we've got a century of military-industrial complex black projects on our side. Would probably start with a full-on HAARP assault, followed by a swarm of stealth drone / flying saucer attacks. Pretty sure that no one other than wealthy, scheming globalists could end our empire.

[guineapig]

Originally Posted by TigerBloodz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

flying saucer attacks

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

<3 SimCity 4


(I edited the link for you... happy now? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.])

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by guineapig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

<3 SimCity 4

Fail.

[naez]

Originally Posted by TigerBloodz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

China may have the numbers, but we've got a century of military-industrial complex black projects on our side. Would probably start with a full-on HAARP assault, followed by a swarm of stealth drone / flying saucer attacks. Pretty sure that no one other than wealthy, scheming globalists could end our empire.

Indeed, the globalists have been on a quest to destroy America pretty much since its inception. The elite of the western world, particularly the king of England, were knocked off their thrones world-wide by the American revolution. It was one of the only, if not the only, time in history that the common man had secured his freedom from the despotism of 'divine right' to rule.

Also, the Chinese secret societies (Red and Green Gangs, Black Dragon) have already threatened to blow up all the US's satellites. So it's not like we can just do it to them and they can't do it back. The Pentagon has run numerous scenarios for contingency against China and they have stated it is militarily impossible. Even a full out nuclear war would be useless, as China has been preparing underground cities for decades ever since China and Russia went at it in '69, and the USA doesn't have anything as intricate.

Also, China probably wouldn't do a land invasion. As some Japanese admiral said at the height of WW2, "There will be an armed American behind every blade of grass". They would just exhaust the US economically home-court advantage, look into Ramen Noodle Armies.

[wehrmacht]

Originally Posted by naez [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

China has been preparing underground cities for decades ever since China and Russia went at it in '69, and the USA doesn't have anything as intricate.

The US on the books strategy for dealing with nuke attacks is to absorb the first wave and just let whoever is targeted die. China can't use a strategy like that because it only takes one MIRV warhead to take out their entire population of 1 billion. This is why China is much easier to kill in any war with technology past WW2.

Originally Posted by soup [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's not to say the US could just stroll into China and just decimate everything no problem

Anyone with WMD's can due to the map below. If you say "without nukes", there are still plenty of weapons just as effective against that.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[soup]

Originally Posted by wehrmacht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Anyone with WMD's can due to the map below. If you say "without nukes", there are still plenty of weapons just as effective against that.

The implication of my statement was that the US wouldn't be able to just casually go over and make China roll over and die. Cause massive amounts of devastation and death? Sure. Have China roll over and die? lol no

[Prince]

Originally Posted by wehrmacht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The US on the books strategy for dealing with nuke attacks is to absorb the first wave and just let whoever is targeted die. China can't use a strategy like that because it only takes one MIRV warhead to take out their entire population of 1 billion. This is why China is much easier to kill in any war with technology past WW2.



Anyone with WMD's can due to the map below. If you say "without nukes", there are still plenty of weapons just as effective against that.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

hows that any different than the us?

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Beastro]

China can't use a strategy like that because it only takes one MIRV warhead to take out their entire population of 1 billion.

Keep say it, but it's bullshit until you describe exactly how one warhead would kill a billion people when it's insufficient to wipe out even a single city.

Besides, warheads aren't commonly targeted at population centers, they are sanely targeted at the enemies war make capabilities. It just so happens many of them fall within population centers.

The Soviet Union varied from that because of their different take on a nuclear exchange. They didn't think it would end after the first exchange and prepared weapons to be fired after that to keep the enemy down.

They also looked on the world differently and had pretty much every capital, NATO or neutral regardless. The SU would be hurting and the turd world would become a threat potential threat post-WWIII and since all those countries are centered completely around their capitals, nuking them would keep them out of the picture.

The Typhoon Class SSBNs were built to this premise, they'd remain under the Arctic ice during the main exchange and then only surface and fire their SLBM months later to attack NATO as they tried to rebuild.

The US on the books strategy for dealing with nuke attacks is to absorb the first wave and just let whoever is targeted die.

This is result of Kennedy, McNamara and the Democrats dismantling of the SACs anti-ballistic missile defence projects in the early 60s and them later cutting into the new attempts at it when Bush was in power.

They're also responsible for the shift from manned bombers to ICBMs which reduced the reaction time during a nuclear crisis from days and hours to 5 minutes.

[guineapig]

Explain.

We are talking about a fictitious fairytale war where nukes, allies and economies don't exist.

People start mentioning top secret HAARP technology and flying saucer attacks.

And then I fail for posting a screenshot of a flying saucer attack?

dude...