Open Classic Dragons Raid Agreement 2017

[Pan]

Originally Posted by Whirled [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So when's this happening?

Vox could happen as early as the 5th of September (looking at the potential windows).

Question is getting everyone on board - getting that part of it wrapped up. Most stakeholders/capable guilds agreed in principle to the idea in the other thread (linked above).

Sometimes stuff moves like molasses around here, but there's really not any reason that the 5th for Vox is beyond reach.

[Unclebulgaria]

Infernus is happy to abide by this agreement.

Audhe
60 Enchanter
Guild Leader <Infernus>

[Culkasi]

Europa of course supports this initiative

[Daldaen]

<Daldaen'a Pals> agree with this proposal.

I offer my sword in this effort.

[Erati]

Originally Posted by Daldaen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

<Daldaen'a Pals> agree with this proposal.

I offer my sword in this effort.

Your fake guild is called <Dald's Pals> bc it has a much better ring to it.

GAH

[Lhancelot]

For those who never seen a p99 dragon, this could be the vehicle that makes that happen. Selfless and kind of you, thanks dude.

[dennardscott86]

<Blood Guard> supports this agreement and will be happy to help in Any way my fellow Hairy Foot Warlord.

[Breaken]

Awakened has no problem with this. I will say that 6 months is a long trial period, but if the "open raid" continues to kill these targets, it's not a problem.

What I mean by this is, the point of this agreement is to allow an "open raid" once a month. If random_guild_01 comes and snipes Lord Nagafen from this open raid because he spawned an hour into his window and the open raid won't be setting up for hours, this could be a problem. If it happens more than once, I believe this agreement should be void until we can solve the problem, whether that be notifying the random_guild_01 and getting them on board, or.. I don't know.

Disclaimer: By agreeing to this, Awakened will not be random_guild_01. It was simply an example and not a loophole for us to back out.

[Razerpaw]

Originally Posted by Breaken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Awakened has no problem with this. I will say that 6 months is a long trial period, but if the "open raid" continues to kill these targets, it's not a problem.

What I mean by this is, the point of this agreement is to allow an "open raid" once a month. If random_guild_01 comes and snipes Lord Nagafen from this open raid because he spawned an hour into his window and the open raid won't be setting up for hours, this could be a problem. If it happens more than once, I believe this agreement should be void until we can solve the problem, whether that be notifying the random_guild_01 and getting them on board, or.. I don't know.

Disclaimer: By agreeing to this, Awakened will not be random_guild_01. It was simply an example and not a loophole for us to back out.

What a strange scenario you've managed to concoct. It almost sounds like you're secretly hoping this doesn't work out so you can maintain pixel rights. I can see why people don't care too much for your guild and why many of your members choose to stay /anon.

[Breaken]

Originally Posted by Razerpaw [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What a strange scenario you've managed to concoct. It almost sounds like you're secretly hoping this doesn't work out so you can maintain pixel rights. I can see why people don't care too much for your guild and why many of your members choose to stay /anon.

It is quite literally the most probable outcome. Maybe you haven't played here before? Try harder to troll. I also believe you are confusing Awakened with Aftermath, as it is Aftermath that is getting the /anon raiders.