Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-05-2011, 03:28 PM
Chrushev Chrushev is offline
Fire Giant

Chrushev's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 680
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azzbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Retro nerf or current drops go unchanged?
Some items got retro nerfed... Fungi Robe/Tunic kept their regen, the new versions didnt have regen.

Pretty sure thats how it went down :P
  #2  
Old 04-05-2011, 03:36 PM
sero sero is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 144
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrushev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Some items got retro nerfed... Fungi Robe/Tunic kept their regen, the new versions didnt have regen.

Pretty sure thats how it went down :P
Are you basing this on any source or just because you're "pretty sure that's how it went down?"
  #3  
Old 04-05-2011, 04:27 PM
Azzbad Azzbad is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 242
Default

Fungi TUNIC always had fungal regrowth and it was never removed. This discussion may not be suited for those that did not know that.
  #4  
Old 04-05-2011, 06:11 PM
Mcbard Mcbard is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Da U.P. eh
Posts: 992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azzbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Fungi TUNIC always had fungal regrowth and it was never removed. This discussion may not be suited for those that did not know that.
Uhh..
  #5  
Old 04-14-2011, 01:03 PM
stonebeard22 stonebeard22 is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: MO
Posts: 336
Default

I would like to see a GM post as well. I for one, am like the few other of letting the robe keep its regen, it's not game breaking, and only really helps monks out. And makes a couple less people want a fungi tunic.

But if they did that the server wouldn't be accurate now would it? We can all wish!
__________________
Amapolo, creeping on ya since 1999.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uthgaard View Post
Daire 2011-02-26 18:50:55 Dropped Item [commons] 17969{,10146,2280}
Amapolo 2011-02-26 18:51:29 Picked Up Item [commons] 17969{,10146,2280}
  #6  
Old 04-14-2011, 01:28 PM
kylok kylok is offline
Fire Giant

kylok's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 576
Default

I wouldn't give up on hope.. not everything on this server is 100% classic. All of the raid encounters are on different spawn timers then they were on live.. except maybe VS. There was that GM event before kunark where people randomly got manastones, guises, mistwalkers... theres always hope.
  #7  
Old 04-14-2011, 01:30 PM
stonebeard22 stonebeard22 is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: MO
Posts: 336
Default

True. Our GM staff is WAY better than Sonys.
__________________
Amapolo, creeping on ya since 1999.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uthgaard View Post
Daire 2011-02-26 18:50:55 Dropped Item [commons] 17969{,10146,2280}
Amapolo 2011-02-26 18:51:29 Picked Up Item [commons] 17969{,10146,2280}
  #8  
Old 04-14-2011, 01:42 PM
kylok kylok is offline
Fire Giant

kylok's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 576
Default

Looking at the tunic vs the robe, I could only imagine a monk wearing the robe over the tunic unless you're wild about the green robe graphic. Tunic has twice the AC and -10 dex/agi doesn't mean much to most anyone except warriors, rogues, rangers, maybe monks... and we all know that we'll put up with it for the regen if we have to.

I'm very interested to see what decision the dev's make on this one.
  #9  
Old 04-14-2011, 02:29 PM
Loke Loke is offline
Fire Giant

Loke's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: AKANON PROBABLY
Posts: 781
Default

I love Abashi's responses lol. Seriously? How could no one there be aware of a nerf, much less be completely oblivious the the fact the robe ever had a regen effect. Just, wow haha.
  #10  
Old 04-14-2011, 02:47 PM
nilbog nilbog is offline
Project Manager

nilbog's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,715
Default

select count(*) from items

62496

Some of that item total is post classic.. but the point remains. There are a LOT of items. I'd imagine at the time they were dealing with a fresh Kunark release and problems from the biggest, most(?) exploitable game in 2000.

I'd say someone could easily .. update items set (fungal regrowth) where name like %fungi%, and be completely oblivious to the consequences.

That's really dumb, but possible.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:53 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.