Ogre vs Iksar

[Dolalin]

Originally Posted by Victorio [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

AC isn't meaningless. Similar HP tanks fare visibly differently based on AC on many mobs.

On end game content it simply doesn't matter. High AC will lower the average damage you take, but it's not about that. It's about the worst case. Who cares that AoW hits for less than a max on the flurry 9/10 times when a cheal is landing literally every second? If you don't have the hp to survive that 1/10 times, you die, and the raid wipes. That simple.

A warrior could tank the aow naked as long as defensive was up and the chain was solid.

[Maner]

Originally Posted by Dolalin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

On end game content it simply doesn't matter. High AC will lower the average damage you take, but it's not about that. It's about the worst case. Who cares that AoW hits for less than a max on the flurry 9/10 times when a cheal is landing literally every second? If you don't have the hp to survive that 1/10 times, you die, and the raid wipes. That simple.

A warrior could tank the aow naked as long as defensive was up and the chain was solid.

This is wrong, AC lowers the chance of you being hit for max. Meaning more ac would make it so you get 1 max hit on that AOW flurry rather than 2 or 3. And a naked warrior would get 1 rounded even through defensive on AOW. How many times has CSG even killed AoW for you to comment?

[Nuggie]

Originally Posted by Maner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

. How many times has CSG even killed AoW for you to comment?

atleast once where the first tank tanked for 4 minutes.

We may not mindlessly farm the same crap every week, like some, but we have had our accomplishments.

[EQsale]

Originally Posted by Dolalin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

On end game content it simply doesn't matter. High AC will lower the average damage you take, but it's not about that. It's about the worst case. Who cares that AoW hits for less than a max on the flurry 9/10 times when a cheal is landing literally every second? If you don't have the hp to survive that 1/10 times, you die, and the raid wipes. That simple.

A warrior could tank the aow naked as long as defensive was up and the chain was solid.

LOL this guys clearly brain dead n knows jack shit go tank aow naked there bud n tell me how long u last

[Lhancelot]

Originally Posted by Dolalin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A warrior could tank the aow naked as long as defensive was up and the chain was solid.

This solves the dilemma right here.

Ogres are the winner. Ogres are much larger, girthier in nature and we all know that girth is much more important than any other deciding factor when we judging nakedness.

OP, your answer has been given.

Ogre is the clear cut winner.

[beta]

Originally Posted by Dolalin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

On end game content it simply doesn't matter. High AC will lower the average damage you take, but it's not about that. It's about the worst case. Who cares that AoW hits for less than a max on the flurry 9/10 times when a cheal is landing literally every second? If you don't have the hp to survive that 1/10 times, you die, and the raid wipes. That simple.

A warrior could tank the aow naked as long as defensive was up and the chain was solid.

oh man what a good laugh

[fiveeauxfour]

gnome

[Tarskin]

Embrace the tail!

[Vianna]

Iksar is clearly the best option if you are min-maxing.

[Swish]

iksar