![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
![]() Here is a guide to monk FD from an archived version of Monkly-Business circa November 2000.
http://web.archive.org/web/200012100...skills/fd.html | ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
![]() I am not arguing the failing chance patch, however the fail while attacking is just unnecessary and kind of like recreating a bug.
It was a mistake that was corrected later on. Not everything "Classic" was as intended. It's easily solved of course by creating a button (/attack off /cast #), but in the future perhaps one should ask themselves if the adjustment to the spell or skill makes sense, or is just a waste of time. Anyway, back to waiting for log server to work :/ | ||
Last edited by umpf2010; 02-27-2010 at 08:53 PM..
Reason: grammar
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
![]() To my knowledge (played a monk from classic until mid-luclin), NotInvitedHere has it right.
| ||
|
#4
|
|||
|
![]() I have to agree with Umpf. I still have an item database on my small sewing kit (very very very not classic), and yet we're patching to put confirmed bugs BACK into the game?
PS. I think the discussion about the "remembrance mechanic" upon standing has ties to the message you get while on the ground for an extended period: "Your enemies have forgotten about you". | ||
Last edited by Bayleo; 02-27-2010 at 09:12 PM..
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
![]() always wondered why feign would never fail.
| ||
|
#6
|
|||
|
![]() If you have a problem with a particular thing then make a post specifically about it ffs. If you want the pets not using the damage/delay of weapons given to them, make a post about it in the bugs forum with supporting evidence. If you think the change they have made to fd is wrong, then post some evidence about it in the appropriate thread.
| ||
|
#7
|
|||
|
![]() Thanks for clearing that up, haynar. I started playing almost immediately after the guise was taken out (my friend was in a high level guild and informed me) and by the time i hit level 17, feign was re-aggroing. I guess we can expect it soon.
| ||
|
#8
|
|||
|
![]() Moved into the Rants and Flames section, as that is the path people have chosen to take in this thread.
XOXOXOX Haynar | ||
|
#9
|
|||
|
![]() of course it was overpowered and needed a nerf (glad they waited) but the added FD -if not attacking it will work- "fix" is just odd. Guess this is more bout finding balance between classic enforcement and silly re-bugging mistakes in classic.
No disrespect to the crew, appreciate all the work you guys put in. | ||
|
#10
|
|||
|
![]() Siinge continues to cherry pick wrong info from retards on alla to support his misinformation train. I seriously don't think you've posted ANYTHING correct on these forums. Spell FD could always fail.
| ||
|
![]() |
|
|