Titanium DL

[Haynar]

I have 3 copies of Titanium.

neener neener

[nectarprime]

Originally Posted by Haynar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have 3 copies of Titanium.

neener neener

Actually we all have infinite copies.

[nyclin]

Originally Posted by Haynar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have 3 copies of Titanium.

neener neener

i've got an iso file and a cd burner

checkmate

[fastboy21]

There are victimless crimes, but there is no such thing as victimless copyright violation. If there is no victim it can't be a copyright violation. It pretty simple.

[paulgiamatti]

Yes, I'll concede that point, but it won't stop me from saying pirating Titanium is a victimless crime because calling Daybreak a victim in that scenario is extremely hyperbolic. If it diminishes their copyright power at all then it's not enough for me to say they've been victimized.

[nectarprime]

Oh fuck off, don't try and act like you're smarter than anyone here. You just said that even if you leech copyrighted media you WILL get a C&D, and then in you very next post you say that you never said that. Then you try and put me down because you're talking yourself in circles and can't even keep your story straight.

Again, moving the goalposts when you're asked to prove your statements. Everyone here knows you're just tooting your own horn.

[paulgiamatti]

Originally Posted by nectarprime [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh fuck off, don't try and act like you're smarter than anyone here. You just said that even if you leech copyrighted media you WILL get a C&D, and then in you very next post you say that you never said that. Then you try and put me down because you're talking yourself in circles and can't even keep your story straight.

Again, moving the goalposts when you're asked to prove your statements. Everyone here knows you're just tooting your own horn.

Again, go read up on straw-manning someone's argument versus steel-manning someone's argument. I don't respond kindly to people who are obviously capable of knowing what I meant, yet latch onto insignificant details like the use of "will" instead of "can", which doesn't have anything to do with my overall point. That's how you construct a paltry, weaker version of someone's argument so that you can feel like you've won the debate when you topple it. It's not impressive.

[nectarprime]

You're a dumbass, everyone here knows your're a dumbass (including Rogean), nothing you type will change that lmao

[Geek.Verve]

I didn't realize there were so many attorneys in this community. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]