![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
2
42 The most obvious answer based on zero context and minimizing the complexity of the patterns? It depends on what you mean by "next". | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
or it's death function port to bind 'cause sufficient hps less than 0 hps --------- but why isn't it -2638 *word | |||
|
Last edited by entruil; 10-27-2016 at 02:41 PM..
Reason: *
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
In regards to || I was just using it in place of Or. such as the or operator used in C#, C && || C++. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
| |||
|
Last edited by Baler; 10-27-2016 at 02:24 PM..
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Next two lines are: 46 26 What's next?
__________________
<Millenial Snowfkake Utopia>
| ||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
Maybe that's why I almost came up with 666.... >.> But I saw a descending pattern, but not to a two digit number. Anyway, next maybe 12. ...or 5150 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] for you scanner hounds hehe don't hurt yourself with that! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
|
|||
|
Melon tricking the forums into doing her math homework
Check your work, folks. we don't want her failing, getting some shit paying job, and then pretending a wage gap exists. | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|