1/3 of Russian population headed to bunkers

[Jarnauga]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Conceptually, paying more because you are a guy is no different than paying less because you have a safe driving record, a safe car, good grades, elevated age, etc. They are all valid indicators of risk.

i totally disagree, you can't help being a guy, you didn't choose it (whatever some SJWs think). You actually chose to respect road laws, etc. If you're involved in an accident that you were found responsible for (i'm simplifying obviously), yeah i'm fine with making him pay more because of his record. the difference being you're not just a statistic, it's your actual responsibility as a person, and that's a big deal.

i don't know how it is in the USA, but in here if i had to pay more because i was a guy, there would be an outrage, it would be considered discrimination..

[Nihilist_santa]

He had an interesting idea about a false anti-christ. I thought it had some merit. Basically he felt that "NWO/ZOG" would float a fake anti-christ type. Then their own antichrist comes in and defeats that dude. Everyone bows down and worships him etc as the defeater of ZOG/NWO

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Chris White is a good dude. I used to listen to his podcast about 10 years ago. He had some pretty decent debunking vids when Zeitgeist came around. Think he became a teacher so I havent seen much from him lately.

Pretty good video for its social commentary.

Especially the bit about women. I'll find myself casually talking about speeding tickets, after I just sped 100mph to the bar, and casually mention I had a great radar detector system, the K-40 at one point to cover me on stuff like that.

And the K-40 is different than a garbage radar detector for X Y Z reasons. She doesn't care that in fact, its not a radar detector, its a radar interdiction system that's fully intelligent with range up to 2 miles front and back. She doesn't care that it intelligently detects radar gun fire, and the threat level, including direct hits. She doesn't care that its directional and you can tell if a cop is INCOMING or ONCOMING.

She mentions her speeding tickets in Upstate NY. etc. more small talk.

All under a 5 minute small talk convo while picking up food.

^ THATS ALL GUY STUFF. TECHNOLOGY IS A GUY THING. WE Aren't EQUAL, CULTURAL MARXISM IS A LIE. We aren't wired the same. Women aren't wired for competition, she doesn't care that the K-40 basically allows you to speed as much as you want without any real problems as long as you know the roads and keep your eyes sharp.

SHE DOESN"T INTENTIONALLY SPEED. SPEEDING IS A COMPETITIVE THING. WOMEN ARENT COMPETITIVE. SHE GOT 2 TICKETS BECAUSE SHES A DUNCE, NOT BECAUSE SHES A SPEEDER. IT WAS UNINTENTIONAL.

She doesn't care that the K-40 costs 1,500 dollars and requires factory installation.

Shes basic. Treat her like shes mentally special, act like willie wonka in the original movie and smile cutely at anything she says. Quip back at her, don't inform her.

She also has kids, and you can smell the desperation. Steer clear.

[maskedmelon]

I don't think speeding is inherently competitive... Not paying attention is quickest way to a ticket though. I cannot count how many times I've spotted popo in the shadows and hit my brakes only to see the car in front or behind me get hit for going slower than me :/

I think the biggest difference in driving between men and women is men just don't care about anyone. It's like they don't even give a thought to what the person in the car next to or across from them is going to do. They just drive and do whatever they want without even trying to communicate with anyone. It's most certainly the reason men are more prone to more traffic violations and are reasonably charged higher insurance rates. It's nothing to do with competition it's just wanton disregard for fellow drivers.

I'm not saying everyone needs to smile and cede their turn to someone else at every four way stop (thouggh it can be a nice gesture sometimes), but ffs at least try to understand what the other person is aiming to do. A lot men can learn from women about driving.

[Lune]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pretty good video for its social commentary.

Especially the bit about women. I'll find myself casually talking about speeding tickets, after I just sped 100mph to the bar, and casually mention I had a great radar detector system, the K-40 at one point to cover me on stuff like that.

And the K-40 is different than a garbage radar detector for X Y Z reasons. She doesn't care that in fact, its not a radar detector, its a radar interdiction system that's fully intelligent with range up to 2 miles front and back. She doesn't care that it intelligently detects radar gun fire, and the threat level, including direct hits. She doesn't care that its directional and you can tell if a cop is INCOMING or ONCOMING.

She mentions her speeding tickets in Upstate NY. etc. more small talk.

All under a 5 minute small talk convo while picking up food.

^ THATS ALL GUY STUFF. TECHNOLOGY IS A GUY THING. WE Aren't EQUAL, CULTURAL MARXISM IS A LIE. We aren't wired the same. Women aren't wired for competition, she doesn't care that the K-40 basically allows you to speed as much as you want without any real problems as long as you know the roads and keep your eyes sharp.

SHE DOESN"T INTENTIONALLY SPEED. SPEEDING IS A COMPETITIVE THING. WOMEN ARENT COMPETITIVE. SHE GOT 2 TICKETS BECAUSE SHES A DUNCE, NOT BECAUSE SHES A SPEEDER. IT WAS UNINTENTIONAL.

She doesn't care that the K-40 costs 1,500 dollars and requires factory installation.

Shes basic. Treat her like shes mentally special, act like willie wonka in the original movie and smile cutely at anything she says. Quip back at her, don't inform her.

She also has kids, and you can smell the desperation. Steer clear.

Hope you wrap yourself around a tree you literal retard. People like you are the reason men pay higher auto insurance rates.

[maskedmelon]

Men pay higher insurance rates because they're reckless. Women aren't reckless. Sure, maybe miss a turn or something because you couldn't get over, but that's because I like men, women actually try to make sure what the other person is doing and acknowledges the move. Men just get over whenever the hell they want often causing people to slam on their breaks. The only time women do that is like if they are being pressured.

I think women do struggle with spatial relations though. Men seem to have a better understanding of like the bounds of their car and stuff and I don't think that is just because men drive more than women. Good test is to have a man and a woman try to pack the same set of items of different sizes and shapes into the same size container. The man will generally do a better job because their brains are tailored to simple tasks like that. Men are inherently more visual it's why it isn't difficult to find an attractive girl with an ugly-ass old man, but not so easy to find the opposite. Probably also the reason men don't suffer more traffic violations then they do despite their recklessness.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hope you wrap yourself around a tree you literal retard. People like you are the reason men pay higher auto insurance rates.

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hope you wrap yourself around a tree you literal retard. People like you are the reason men pay higher auto insurance rates.

ITT people get angry about speeding on open roads.

I've been speeding for about 8-9 years, probably closer to 10. I have sped every single day of my life. Never even had a close call. Only accidents I have been in are between 0-25mph, but never was found to be at fault. Have only been struck by other drivers 0-25mph, have never struck another driver 0-25mph. But all accidents involved in my 10 year course of speeding history have been between 0-25mph.

My Adderall script is actually written for compulsive speeding and a desire to read articles on phone unless I can "speed" or travel at a higher rate of speed than whats allowed. Its genetic.

If I cant speed, I get anxiety and have to read articles or multi-task my phone which is even more dangerous. So in this case, you would be the generic vanilla run of the mill Sanders voting retard for making an implication without all the facts.

Its either articles + speed limit, or speeding + no articles. Which would you choose, retard?

I have been cited probably 15-20 times, without any sign of reform. It would appear at this point, this is not going to change any time soon. Driving school x2, and 1 suspension about 10 years ago.

Your little driving school you would so dearly fund (((Lune))) was fucking worthless. None of it connected with me, not a single page or single class made any human connection with my personal situation. Yet you would have them keep funding it [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Lune]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ITT people get angry about speeding on open roads.

I've been speeding for about 8-9 years, probably closer to 10. I have sped every single day of my life. Never even had a close call. Only accidents I have been in are between 0-25mph, but never was found to be at fault. Have only been struck by other drivers 0-25mph, have never struck another driver 0-25mph. But all accidents involved in my 10 year course of speeding history have been between 0-25mph.

My uncle smoked cigarettes for 60 years without getting lung cancer; that's hardly compelling evidence that cigarettes aren't risky. Your personal track record with reckless driving isn't evidence for speeding being safe. It just means your elevated risk of accidental death or injury hasn't cashed in yet. "Speeding is safe because I haven't crashed yet". Yikes. Ask the insurance company actuaries whether that's sound logic.

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My Adderall script is actually written for compulsive speeding and a desire to read articles on phone unless I can "speed" or travel at a higher rate of speed than whats allowed. Its genetic.

If I cant speed, I get anxiety and have to read articles or multi-task my phone which is even more dangerous. So in this case, you would be the generic vanilla run of the mill Sanders voting retard for making an implication without all the facts.

Its either articles + speed limit, or speeding + no articles. Which would you choose, retard?

I have been cited probably 15-20 times, without any sign of reform. It would appear at this point, this is not going to change any time soon. Driving school x2, and 1 suspension about 10 years ago.

Your little driving school you would so dearly fund (((Lune))) was fucking worthless. None of it connected with me, not a single page or single class made any human connection with my personal situation. Yet you would have them keep funding it [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'd choose: If you aren't fit to drive safely, don't drive. It's obvious you need your license revoked.

Why shouldn't a reasonable person be angry about people speeding on open roads? I have to use these roads too, you think I want some mongoloid doped up on adderall speeding around at 100+? What if you blow a tire? What if I blow a tire? What if some idiot turns out in front of me, and you're behind me going 100? What if your superhuman reflexes lapse momentarily and you lose control? We have speed limits for a reason. 5 over, 10 over, that's not a problem, but you've admitted going into the reckless range.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My uncle smoked cigarettes for 60 years without getting lung cancer; that's hardly compelling evidence that cigarettes aren't risky. Your personal track record with reckless driving isn't evidence for speeding being safe. It just means your elevated risk of accidental death or injury hasn't cashed in yet. "Speeding is safe because I haven't crashed yet". Yikes. Ask the insurance company actuaries whether that's sound logic.



I'd choose: If you aren't fit to drive safely, don't drive. It's obvious you need your license revoked.

Why shouldn't a reasonable person be angry about people speeding on open roads? I have to use these roads too, you think I want some mongoloid doped up on adderall speeding around at 100+? What if you blow a tire? What if I blow a tire? What if some idiot turns out in front of me, and you're behind me going 100? What if your superhuman reflexes lapse momentarily and you lose control? We have speed limits for a reason. 5 over, 10 over, that's not a problem, but you've admitted going into the reckless range.

A blowout is a big fear of mine (I realize maintaining good tires and wheels means fuckall) and the only thing that curbs it. 85ish is my preferred cruising speed for personal comfort but if I'm late I'll get over 90 roads permitting.

My dad is in his 60's and a businessman and he's pretty much the same way his entire life. My long distance braking and brake dragging habits(I'm constantly either braking or about to brake) are much safer than his herky-jerky reliance on performance brakes but he drives a different type of car.

Most literature I've read points to a genetic norepinephrine disorder, and not a dopamine disorder. But the Adderall helps so I'd never argue against it. In the Gilbert's syndrome community (liver condition I have) is where I found out more about this compulsive desire to instantaneously complete motor tasks. Most members there self-report the same feelings and behaviors over the history of the web.

But that said, I think a lot of people feel most comfortable around 80-85 on the highway.

I always signal (quick flash) even if I'm in the left lane when making a pass if I feel the speed difference is too great ex middle lane going 55 and I'm trying to maintain 80. Sometimes I do it European style (despite Americans having no idea what it means) and leave the left directional on when traveling over 80

I'm always eyeballing the car I'm passing and anticipating dumb stuff like drifting or an attempted lazy no-look lane change.

The speed we are talking about is mostly highway. I don't consider 55-60 in a 40 after 8 pm all that dangerous.

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A blowout is a big fear of mine (I realize maintaining good tires and wheels means fuckall) and the only thing that curbs it. 85ish is my preferred cruising speed for personal comfort but if I'm late I'll get over 90 roads permitting.

My dad is in his 60's and a businessman and he's pretty much the same way his entire life. My long distance braking and brake dragging habits(I'm constantly either braking or about to brake) are much safer than his herky-jerky reliance on performance brakes but he drives a different type of car.

Most literature I've read points to a genetic norepinephrine disorder, and not a dopamine disorder. But the Adderall helps so I'd never argue against it. In the Gilbert's syndrome community (liver condition I have) is where I found out more about this compulsive desire to instantaneously complete motor tasks. Most members there self-report the same feelings and behaviors over the history of the web.

But that said, I think a lot of people feel most comfortable around 80-85 on the highway.

I always signal (quick flash) even if I'm in the left lane when making a pass if I feel the speed difference is too great ex middle lane going 55 and I'm trying to maintain 80. Sometimes I do it European style (despite Americans having no idea what it means) and leave the left directional on when traveling over 80

I'm always eyeballing the car I'm passing and anticipating dumb stuff like drifting or an attempted lazy no-look lane change.

The speed we are talking about is mostly highway. I don't consider 55-60 in a 40 after 8 pm all that dangerous.

Good to beware a blow out. Saw a truck, supped up late 60's chevy, that had a blowout and go head first into a semi's trailer today. Left lane to right.