UNICEF Seeks $ 115,000,000 To Sustain Misery

[Pokesan]

which aid programs are ineffective? be specific

i think you just enjoy being contrary

i think its pretty great

[entruil]

Originally Posted by Chaboo_Cleric [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Charity should come from the people. Not a mandatory obligation of the government. The problem is we are taxed too hard and the government is too large. Therefore, the additional funds that would be going to charities are being used for the globalist agenda.

bleeegh i agree with this^

they will never stop stealing from people who earn money and if they did global charities would be even worse, local charities and maybe some international ones could be okay but most of your donations are going to end up in the hillary rodham Tlinton(apparently) coffeurs...

if global charities are perpetuating misery... then the globalist agenda includes charity.

[Nihilist_santa]

Originally Posted by entruil [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

what if the globalist agenda includes charity?

HRT = brain rot.

[entruil]

Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

HRT = brain rot.

lol here's a ted talk, includes germans.

Tim Harford: Trial, error and the God complex

[maskedmelon]

I should reiterate thought that it is equally commendable to actually correct the problem, but most are unwilling to do that.

The general point is: support fixing the problem, not sustaining it.

[Jarnauga]

Giving to charities is communism

Good job america ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by entruil [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

bleeegh i agree with this^

they will never stop stealing from people who earn money and if they did global charities would be even worse, local charities and maybe some international ones could be okay but most of your donations are going to end up in the hillary rodham Tlinton(apparently) coffeurs...

if global charities are perpetuating misery... then the globalist agenda includes charity.

My point is that charity in general perpetuates misery with its poor efficacy. It keeps people alive, allows them to make more babies who need more resources and so on without ever lifting people from the state of misery. That is simply deplorable.

And no, I don't consider it a symptom of some globalist conspiracy, it's a symptom of selfish human nature. People subsidize these conditions because it makes them feel better. They feel like they've done something important, helped someone, made a difference. When in fact all they have done is ensure the misery shall continue.

The only effective means of correcting the problem is to remove people from that environmen. That means one of two things.

1. Assume the role of provider and mentor until those people are able to function successfully in their new environment. Most people prefer to have children instead. or

2. Allow nature to take its course. Is that an awful thing to say? Yes, but in the interest of humanity it is the right thing to do. I suppose the most humane course of action would be to hasten the work of nature so the misery is as minimized, but that would run the risk of eliminating potentially valuable mutations from which the rest of mankind could benefit.

Most people are unwilling to pay the material price of 1 or the emotional price of 2 (i.e. assume a lower standard of living to care for and teach another individual that is not their own offspring, or accept the despicable nature of their own actions), so instead, they choose to sustain the misery.

Originally Posted by Jarnauga [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Giving to charities is communism

Good job america ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

This is just odd and no, not what I am saying and not what Daywolf is saying either. We are saying two very different things, but neither is this ^^