****OFFICAL**** Trump Hillary Debate 2016.09.26 Thread****

[Csihar]

How did stop-and-frish work exactly? Did they randomly stop people and frisk them?

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

When an officer is justified in believing that the individual whose suspicious behavior he is investigating at close range is armed and presently dangerous to the officer or to others, it would appear to be clearly unreasonable to deny the officer the power to take necessary measures to determine whether the person is in fact carrying a weapon and to neutralize the threat of physical harm. --Supreme Court, 1968 ruling in response to a 4th amendment case. http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presid...onstitutional/

Stop and frisk is lawful under the constitution. It's left to law enforcement's discretion. HRC and Holt were dead wrong. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

People without their dick up DNC ass have always known stop and frisk is legal.

Weapons checks, and subsequent drug finds, are and will always be legal. The officer has a right to search who he is talking to for his safety.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Csihar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How did stop-and-frish work exactly? Did they randomly stop people and frisk them?

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Csihar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How did stop-and-frish work exactly? Did they randomly stop people and frisk them?

The officer is allowed to know if the person he is talking to poses a threat (weapons etc.)

That's how stop and frisk started and was justified by departments.

[Csihar]

Alrighty. But how was it executed?

Do they randomly (based on racial profiling according to some then apparently but I don't care about that) approach someone and frisk them to see if they have any weapons?

Or was it something put into action once the "suspect" was already being engaged due to suspicious behaviour?

At what point does the stop-and-frisk start?

[Signal]

Originally Posted by R Flair [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Trump absolutely dominated the debate up to about halfway when they sabotaged him with a series of leftist talking points and attacks where the moderated got heavily involved (and corrected by Trump: stop and frisk). Trump got pretty rustled and it left it looking like he didn't do as well.

Having watched the debate again its only more obvious how much better he did overall, despite the overwhelming opposition from both the candidate and the mod.

Its all good though. Trump up again today in polls. The obvious bias only worked in his favor.

Yeah...No.. Trump lost that debate start to finish.

[Signal]

Trump's issues is himself. Hillary is just more Political Savvy than he will ever be. Until Trump learns to get out of his own way he will continue to lose this race.

[R Flair]

Originally Posted by Signal [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Trump's issues is himself. Hillary is just more Political Savvy than he will ever be. Until Trump learns to get out of his own way he will continue to lose this race.

Trump is actually winning "the race." Even in increasingly inaccurate polls, Trump is ahead in popular vote and in delegates.

You are right about him needing to get out of his head.

He still won the debate though because at the end of the day, normal American's could see the collusion of Hillary and the moderator. He got railroaded and became emotional, but it left him looking like the good guy.

Also, he just stomped Hillary for the first half. After that is was no longer a debate but mostly just a series of questions like 'have you stopped beating your wife.' Only someone that drinks the msm koolaid and believes the conspiracies and dirt would interpret it any other way.

[Daywolf]

hah Trump losing from the lead. Then again Sanders skunked Hillary, but I don't think Hillary has enough money to pay off Trump like she did with Sanders. Or was that a "I know where you live" sort of deal >.>

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by R Flair [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Trump is actually winning "the race." Even in increasingly inaccurate polls, Trump is ahead in popular vote and in delegates.

You are right about him needing to get out of his head.

He still won the debate though because at the end of the day, normal American's could see the collusion of Hillary and the moderator. He got railroaded and became emotional, but it left him looking like the good guy.

Also, he just stomped Hillary for the first half. After that is was no longer a debate but mostly just a series of questions like 'have you stopped beating your wife.' Only someone that drinks the msm koolaid and believes the conspiracies and dirt would interpret it any other way.

Fivethirtyeight has Hilbitch at 60% now. Bear in mind that they've predicted the last 2 presidential elections and mid term elections down to the county.