Ghostbusters Remake Flops - Sequels CANCELED, Investors In Debt

[R Flair]

Spy was probably the funniest movie of 2015, so I don't think another flop is going to end things for Melissa. Someone like her is going to have limited opportunities because not everyone has a sarcastic fat chick role to fill. Not really her fault when movies just don't work out.

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by R Flair [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Spy was probably the funniest movie of 2015, so I don't think another flop is going to end things for Melissa. Someone like her is going to have limited opportunities because not everyone has a sarcastic fat chick role to fill. Not really her fault when movies just don't work out.

I can see that, but Spy was terrible. She seemed to be the only interested cast memeber while everyone else was just getting a check to help her. She's definately been niched into that character role, but it doesn't last long. Not gonna fault her for getting dat pay do.

[entruil]

Tryin' to get my mind straight... is this an affirmative-action thread or what?

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by entruil [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Tryin' to get my mind straight... is this an affirmative-action thread or what?

Or what.

[entruil]

neat. thx ren/stimpy.

[Computer Man]

I think it did as well as could be expected given the bad concept. Imagine a remake of Charlie's Angels with all guys - think that would be a big money maker?

[myriverse]

Originally Posted by Computer Man [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think it did as well as could be expected given the bad concept. Imagine a remake of Charlie's Angels with all guys - think that would be a big money maker?

Charlies Angels with all guys is just another law enforcement show/movie.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Computer Man [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think it did as well as could be expected given the bad concept. Imagine a remake of Charlie's Angels with all guys - think that would be a big money maker?

So why do it? That's the question right now in regards to affirmative action.

Why empty investors pockets who worked hard for their money their entire lives? Did you think money is just printed?

Should the SJW effect excuse the studio and director from losing hundreds of millions of dollars out of the US economy? That money could have gone to something more enriching.

I see your thinking is very narrow here.

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So why do it? That's the question right now in regards to affirmative action.

Why empty investors pockets who worked hard for their money their entire lives? Did you think money is just printed?

Should the SJW effect excuse the studio and director from losing hundreds of millions of dollars out of the US economy? That money could have gone to something more enriching.

I see your thinking is very narrow here.

They did it because they thought they'd make money like in any investment, and like any investment, it can fail. Business is business. The guys that put up the money aren't going to be broke from it anyway. Your third paragraph doesn't make any sense.

[pathius41]

Originally Posted by Computer Man [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think it did as well as could be expected given the bad concept. Imagine a remake of Charlie's Angels with all guys - think that would be a big money maker?

Not a freakin chance.