Censor Japan = good / censor the gays = bad

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by Big_Japan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's not the impossible giant conspiracy illuminati strawman you mock here so much as the repercussions of the same techniques of thought control that have you believing there is a substantive difference between Bernie and George Bush. If you think that the force that has you convinced that another neocon is the wave of the future exists only in tinfoil conspiracy theories, can you explain how you've been bent into such a comical pretzel of a jackbooted idiot cuck?

The funny thing is that you think you're in any way kind, gentle, or "liberal" when you're the same flavor of easily led submissive retard that would be sicking german shepherds on homosexuals if the wind were blowing that way. Lick my shoe plebeian.

what a fucking idiot.

thinks being open minded means: has to think rape kidnappng or murder or fuck it, insert anything, is ok.

your a fuckn bad poster pal just being bad.

[Big_Japan]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

what a fucking idiot.

thinks being open minded means: has to think rape kidnappng or murder or fuck it, insert anything, is ok.

your a fuckn bad poster pal just being bad.

But you're a Bernie enthusiast, which means you're a Wars for Israel fan, which means you literally are a rape kidnapping and murder supporter. Wherein am I mistaken?

...right, I'm giving you too much credit by assuming you have thought any deeper about him than "he offered me free shit". My bad.

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by Big_Japan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But you're a Bernie enthusiast, which means you're a Wars for Israel fan, which means you literally are a rape kidnapping and murder supporter. Wherein am I mistaken?

...right, I'm giving you too much credit by assuming you have thought any deeper about him than "he offered me free shit". My bad.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Pokesan]

Would you object if SE pulled it with the expectation of higher sales from the title?

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Would you object if SE pulled it with the expectation of higher sales from the title?

No, that is what I thought we were discussing; the reasons why they might have that expectation. I am annoyed with those who fostered that perception though.

If I don't like tomatoes on my sandwiches I am not going to bitch until sandwich shops stop offering tomatoes in their sandwiches. I'll just look for tomato free sandwiches or sandwich alternatives if those aren't offered. Why take other peoples' tomatoes from them?

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, that is what I thought we were discussing; the reasons why they might have that expectation. I am annoyed with those who fostered that perception though.

If I don't like tomatoes on my sandwiches I am not going to bitch until sandwich shops stop offering tomatoes in their sandwiches. I'll just look for tomato free sandwiches or sandwich alternatives if those aren't offered. Why take other peoples' tomatoes from them?

uh the mere fact that you want a sandwich without tomatoes is censorship and you are bad for trying to ruin gaming.

on top of that, its self censorship... which is even worse.

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, that is what I thought we were discussing; the reasons why they might have that expectation. I am annoyed with those who fostered that perception though.

If I don't like tomatoes on my sandwiches I am not going to bitch until sandwich shops stop offering tomatoes in their sandwiches. I'll just look for tomato free sandwiches or sandwich alternatives if those aren't offered. Why take other peoples' tomatoes from them?

good, good.

now apply the inverse.

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

good, good.

now apply the inverse.

I've already endorsed (this is the third time now) sandwich shops that do not wish to serve tomatoes. That is their prerogative. Are you suggesting that all the regular patrons who enjoy tomatoes should go elsewhere? Doesn't make sense since I the one with the problem and they were happy with he service as is. Why would I do that?

What if I don't even eat sandwiches and I lobby for tomato-free sandwich exclusivity at sandwich shops? What then? Huh?

[Pokesan]

It's more like you're angry with the sandwich shop for offering a sandwich with the most popular ingredients.

Whether the sandwich you liked was once the most popular choice is completely irrelevant to their current goal of selling the most sandwiches they can and earning the most profit.

[maskedmelon]

Oh ok, so you contend that the rest of the sandwich shop patrons and/or sandwich esters in general no longer like tomatoes and I am alone I my tomato indifference. That may be and it's fine too if the case. I am just not convinced that most gamers have any issue at all with the Honey Bee Inn.

If the world in general deems tomatoes foul though, then business expansion would certainly be a challenge. I don't think that is the case either though. I do t think most people care about the content of other peoples' sandwiches. It just happens that the fee who do are very vocal about it.

I could be wrong though. The world may be most displeased with my indifference or appreciation of tomatoes.

I am most interested in why SE believes the world is against tomatoes. 70 years ago, sure, that whole sequence would have been offensive to many. But today?