![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
I have two questions.
1. What sort of content is censored out of these 'dating sims' you seem so fond of? 2. What is the difference between a 'dating sim' and a cartoon? | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
Can confirm, game developer here.
There is this INSANELY huge illuminati society that reaches out to game devs across all platforms. If you put [something, I'm not even at liberty to say] in games, then you will likely be removed from your position and blacklisted from the industry. One thing I can promise you for sure is, people like Kaga and youtube posters that talk about games industry illuminati are absolutely the smartest guys in the room and NEVER have EVER made assumptions about information they read about on the internet. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Says the guy who sent me... I lost count after a while... how many PMs in August/September 2014 about his personal friend Anita and how she's a good girl and dindu nuffin.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
In the FFVII remake they have alluded to plans to alter the fuuzoku sequence. Whether it is an issue with some of the girls' comments, perceived mockery of transgendered peoples with Cloud's drag, or disparaging of homosexuals with Cloud's displeasure at the all male group service provided is unclear. The whole sequence is funny though and I don't see who'd be offended to be honest.
YouTube Honeybee Inn FFVII if you haven't played the game ^^
__________________
<Millenial Snowfkake Utopia>
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Undoubtedly being pulled to avoid backlash from outside the target audience or distancing potential newcomers. At the same time while generally serving their fans well, SE has made ardent strides to broaden their fan base. The abomination that was FFXIIIP speaks to that. SE has every right to pull content they don't like, but it is a sad state of affairs if special interest outsiders are dictating what is acceptable to the developer and its audience. I am more curious about the reasoning behind it myself, because it is not immediately clear to me what would now be considered offensive to someone, which would not have previously been considered offensive. The three items that I through out are just because LGBT and "rape culture" have been hot discussion topics and are really the only themes at work in that sequence (not rape, but exploitation of women). Unless it is something to do with the organized crime???
__________________
<Millenial Snowfkake Utopia>
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#8
|
|||
|
these are the videos kaga watches every night until 4am
https://youtu.be/o1WYimHB1mQ this is his face watching every one [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
The funny thing is that you think you're in any way kind, gentle, or "liberal" when you're the same flavor of easily led submissive retard that would be sicking german shepherds on homosexuals if the wind were blowing that way. Lick my shoe plebeian. TRUMP 2016 | |||
|
Last edited by Big_Japan; 01-08-2016 at 05:34 PM..
Reason: TRUMP 2016
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|