![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
I always respect the "we have it cleared" camp ideal but not when people act like huge assholes and proclaim to the zone that the server rules support their attitude problem. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
|||
|
So.... Everyone here agrees that the OP is a douchebag whiner, yet Uuth bans someone else? /boggle
Was it because of his accusations of shady guide favoritism? Just curious.
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
"Your camp" has been repeatedly defined by GMs and Guides as "THE ROOM YOU OCCUPY". No matter how much whining bitching moaning, this has not and will not ever change.
If you're playing here and insisting beyond all reasonable logic that things should be different than the rules have defined them, you are a moron. If you choose to be a douchebag because you think the rules don't safeguard your XP flow, have fun being banned. If someone wants to use the rules to a T to gain advantage and get ahead and kinda be a dickhead in the process, cool. You getting mad about it... its like... Have you ever played Everquest?
__________________
![]() | ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
If there's a full group clearing in basement, then consider if they decided to sit 1 person in each room. Hence it's camped. Don't be a git.
__________________
Omnimorph - Enchanter
I enchant things... | ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
OP is a tool,
Die in a couch fire
__________________
<< Nester the Molester - 60 Rogue >> << Hassel the Hoff - Druid of the 55th Grind >> << Kassel the Koff - Monk of the 52st Train >> | ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
A quick search came back with a pretty straight forward answer.
Within the first 4 posts of the "Camps, Defined" Thread ( found here http://www.project1999.org/forums/showthread.php?t=2653) this issue is addressed. "1. Going forward, if you intend to hold or claim a camp, your group must retain presence at that camp. If you have no competition in the zone, you are more than welcome to hold as many as you like. The moment another party wants to claim a camp and you are "farming" multiple, you must decide which camp you want and forfeit the ones someone else is interested in." Following through the posts, another thread is linked (http://www.project1999.org/forums/showthread.php?t=6004) The tone of this thread suggested that there is a 50/50 split view on the definition of this particular camp. IMO, in the first thread (Camps, defined) it seems pretty straight forward. The only way I can see a problem is, if you want to argue semantics regarding the term Room or Camp. All that aside , it was still a pretty douche move. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
Your pal, Knuckle | |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
You...Are..Still...Wrong... Enjoy douche ! | |||
|
|
||||
|
#9
|
|||
|
knuckle you were more entertaining when you were ranting about how your the true knuckle.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
I was there after this shit happened on my mage Malagar and my wife was too on her mage Jazzmin. We had absolutely zero problems with Ennoi and a few others there. She told us raiders were open and we hunted there for the next 6+ hours killing raiders gobbies and the occasional guard. She was doing the entrance with her necro friend. The OP obviously just has an axe to grind. However, where Ennoi is wrong is to say something bad about staff or accuse them in a public thread. If you feel that a guide or gm is wrong, take it to petitions please. These guys volunteer their time and effort here, they don't get a paycheck and I'm pretty sure that is why you got banned.
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|