Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-21-2011, 01:37 PM
Kassel Kassel is offline
Fire Giant

Kassel's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 682
Default

Quote:
How is it a ban-able offense when you get scammed, but Kavanah scams him FOR you, and he's fine? I mean I understand the fact that he was a bad guy, but come on...
This
__________________
<< Nester the Molester - 60 Rogue >>

<< Hassel the Hoff - Druid of the 55th Grind >>
<< Kassel the Koff - Monk of the 52st Train >>
  #2  
Old 01-24-2011, 11:10 AM
DetroitVelvetSmooth DetroitVelvetSmooth is offline
Sarnak

DetroitVelvetSmooth's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 490
Default

Nothing more classic then unaddressed exploits.
__________________
I apologize for the prior sig gif. Here are some kittens.
  #3  
Old 01-24-2011, 11:36 AM
Chanus Chanus is offline
Fire Giant

Chanus's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 528
Default

What is the difference in paying for an MQ for JBoots or paying someone who farmed GEBs or any other item?

Trade is an integral part of the game and its economy.
__________________
Faeala >21 High Elf Enchanter<
Aurean >14 Dwarf Warrior<

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrison View Post
You'd be impressed if someone showed you the inner workings of a fucking lego castle.
  #4  
Old 01-24-2011, 11:56 AM
jilena jilena is offline
Fire Giant

jilena's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 527
Default

*shrug* this is the same need before greed argument as always. For most people it looks better for a melee class to claim they need an fbss than for a caster to claim they need it to sell so they can buy GEBs they will actually wear. I'm not really sure why MMO players feel that camping something you can sell to buy something you need is more despicable than camping something you need directly. It has always been the case though for as long as I can remember.
__________________
~not hiding behind my forum account~
blue: zarina / gumby / park / lulls / kiss / pamela / barbarous / dolemite / patsy / tick / cupid / jilena / magine
red: trolling / lust
  #5  
Old 01-24-2011, 12:13 PM
Chanus Chanus is offline
Fire Giant

Chanus's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 528
Default

I agree it's less-than-courteous to block someone from getting an item they can use so that you can make money off them, but that doesn't make it wrong.

And I don't equate it to a caster looting an FBSS when there's a melee class in the group that doesn't have one. That's just bad form (though also, not wrong in a "legal" sense, for lack of a better term).
__________________
Faeala >21 High Elf Enchanter<
Aurean >14 Dwarf Warrior<

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrison View Post
You'd be impressed if someone showed you the inner workings of a fucking lego castle.
  #6  
Old 01-24-2011, 12:28 PM
jilena jilena is offline
Fire Giant

jilena's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 527
Default

Point being all items have some value to all players. Whether it's to sell and buy something they like, or to use directly. Why is having money to buy a nicer item more greedy than just having a nicer item? I have personally never rolled on an item to sell when someone in the group "needed" it. I just see both sides of the argument. No melee can solo an FBSS or SSoY. However all of them can solo the AC for a ring or Pyzjn for a GBS to sell. Does that make them bastards because some random caster wanted to camp Pyzjn or some random noob wanted to camp a ring? Obviously demanding an equal chance at such loot in a group is more immediate... But it's the same thing really. If you put in the same amount of time camping an item why are you a greedy bastard if you want to sell it for cash to buy, or directly trade it for something you would use? Maybe the person who is gonna equip the item is being more greedy because they feel that their being able to use it directly is more important than your need to use the cash from it to buy something else!! *shrug*
__________________
~not hiding behind my forum account~
blue: zarina / gumby / park / lulls / kiss / pamela / barbarous / dolemite / patsy / tick / cupid / jilena / magine
red: trolling / lust
  #7  
Old 01-24-2011, 01:30 PM
xshayla701 xshayla701 is offline
Fire Giant

xshayla701's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 811
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jilena [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Point being all items have some value to all players. Whether it's to sell and buy something they like, or to use directly. Why is having money to buy a nicer item more greedy than just having a nicer item? I have personally never rolled on an item to sell when someone in the group "needed" it. I just see both sides of the argument. No melee can solo an FBSS or SSoY. However all of them can solo the AC for a ring or Pyzjn for a GBS to sell. Does that make them bastards because some random caster wanted to camp Pyzjn or some random noob wanted to camp a ring? Obviously demanding an equal chance at such loot in a group is more immediate... But it's the same thing really. If you put in the same amount of time camping an item why are you a greedy bastard if you want to sell it for cash to buy, or directly trade it for something you would use? Maybe the person who is gonna equip the item is being more greedy because they feel that their being able to use it directly is more important than your need to use the cash from it to buy something else!! *shrug*
agree with this

but I thought the point of this argument against selling the Jboots ring MQ was because those who monopolize the AC camp and don't leave it for people who don't want to buy it but do want to camp the spawn for themselves? I don't think it would be bad to camp it when it's open (but really... when is it ever just open?), but there are people who switch off the spawn with their friend so that either themselves or their friend always has the camp.
__________________
  #8  
Old 01-24-2011, 01:37 PM
Chanus Chanus is offline
Fire Giant

Chanus's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 528
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xshayla701 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
but there are people who switch off the spawn with their friend so that either themselves or their friend always has the camp.
Pretty easy to defeat that method, even assuming it actually happens.

As it is obviously not the case that two people have permanently monopolized the camp, get on the list and once you acquire the camp, publicly announce the list when people are added. Ask the next person on the list to do this as well.

This would ensure the list is honored, and would prevent such behavior as just passing the camp to a friend and having that friend pass it back to the first person as there should always be someone else on the list in between them.
__________________
Faeala >21 High Elf Enchanter<
Aurean >14 Dwarf Warrior<

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrison View Post
You'd be impressed if someone showed you the inner workings of a fucking lego castle.
  #9  
Old 01-24-2011, 01:42 PM
Harrison Harrison is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chanus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Pretty easy to defeat that method, even assuming it actually happens.

As it is obviously not the case that two people have permanently monopolized the camp, get on the list and once you acquire the camp, publicly announce the list when people are added. Ask the next person on the list to do this as well.

This would ensure the list is honored, and would prevent such behavior as just passing the camp to a friend and having that friend pass it back to the first person as there should always be someone else on the list in between them.
As per GM statements: Camps are handled by players, and can give them to whoever they want. Regardless of "lists" or anything.

If I want to forego the list entirely and give the camp to my friend, I can. It's up to the camp holder, not some arbitrarily chosen time of arrival.
  #10  
Old 01-24-2011, 01:44 PM
Chanus Chanus is offline
Fire Giant

Chanus's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 528
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrison [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
As per GM statements: Camps are handled by players, and can give them to whoever they want. Regardless of "lists" or anything.

If I want to forego the list entirely and give the camp to my friend, I can. It's up to the camp holder, not some arbitrarily chosen time of arrival.
Sure, you can.

If you want to risk your reputation and possibly end up blacklisted from future lists, go right ahead and discard a publicly announced list in favor of your own greed.

(I realize you're not necessarily saying you would do this, yourself)

Frontier justice that does not break any existing rules might be the way people need to go with things like this.
__________________
Faeala >21 High Elf Enchanter<
Aurean >14 Dwarf Warrior<

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrison View Post
You'd be impressed if someone showed you the inner workings of a fucking lego castle.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:21 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.