![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
Killing someone who has invaded your home is generally not recognized as murder though. And for good reason. Why should any victim be forced bear the risk of an aggressive act perpetrated by someone else? The problem is uncertainty. First the invaders motives are unknown. Second even benign motives may change upon their discovery. The invader runs the risk of prosecution if caught, so the stakes are raised in any encounter. That makes the discoverer a threat to the invader whether armed or not. Inaction by the discoverer could result in tragedy. Of course the counter argument is that action could also result in tragedy. Tragedy is tragedy, plain and simple. If we are forced to favor one side or the other though (which we are), who ought we favor? The person who has already suffered an act of aggression? Or, the person who has perpetrated that act? | |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
|||
|
damn...this guy was a regular at a bar i used to goto alot. pretty sure my partner has photos of us drinking together. he was a serious conspiracy nut.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
Aside from the "definitely white shooter" thing, you're right. He was black but light skinned in the video I saw from the news, and also from his 1st person camera that he was apparently streaming. Side by side video <--- NSFW due to graphic nature. From his perspective (video on the right) you can see that the reporter looks over at him while he has the gun pointed at her and doesn't respond. The woman being interviewed would have seen him pointing a gun in her peripheral. He doesn't begin firing until the news cameraman pans over to her, and when he does shoot, he's aiming slightly to the left (this is done even with blanks at that range to avoid bits of potential shrapnel). The camerawoman's reaction seems rehearsed and insincere, and she didn't even stumble as she fled despite being shot several times in the chest? I can't be certain, and I doubt anyone ever will be given the way the US government operates, but I believe there's a good reason so many people are questioning the validity of this incident. In addition, the white house was already prepared with an anti-gun speech, and Operation Jade Helm 15 (which seems to be a martial law deployment test run) is just about to wrap up on the 15th of next month. I think the government is beginning to get sloppy. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
Most/All will have acting backgrounds. Little to No remorse. A little thing called Duping delight (where people who are lying about something "serious" cant help but laugh. You'll notice this a lot. They'll look away from the camera, smirk, etc while theyre in the middle of a sentence about their dead relative who died just hours ago)I guarantee it. Another thing you'll notice a lot is the colors green and purple. Couldn't tell you why, but they love green and purple when they're lying. Sandy Hoax, All actors. Every single one of the theater shootings, More and more actors. Hell, 9/11 even had actors, really shitty ones at that. Boston Bombing, Actors. And countless other events. Its a reoccurring pattern in every event and it only adds to the suspicion when they only interview actors that just happened to be there. Many of them btw, have just happened to be at 2 or sometimes even 3+ of these "major events" Now tell me, what are the chances of multiple nobodies with acting backgrounds who apparently travel the states not only witness one of these, but multiple? Its almost like they were sent there, like its their job! /gasp | |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
All of these things precede some sort of push by the government to gain sympathy for whatever agenda they have. This most recent incident, combined with the BLM riots and the threat of them spreading, the winding down of Jade Helm, and the already prepared speech that proceeded the shooting in Virginia, I'm a bit worried what they're planning. They're actually trying to start a race war for some political agenda. It makes me feel a little better that they're being so sloppy about it though. It kind of seems like they want to incite riots everywhere and disarm everyone who legally owns a gun so that the military 'has to move in and control the situations'. I'm not sure why though. Most everyone is already obedient and pays their taxes. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
|||
|
We have a mental health and social class problem (border lining on caste system and corporate oligarchy). Not specifically a "black problem." People of all fruity flavors commit violent crimes.
Also, there is an incentive system for the prison industry to incarcerate people.
__________________
Thulghor Skullgrinder (Blue Server)
Ogre Champion Soldier of Rallos Zek <The Second Sons> (former member of <Vesica Dei>, <Evoluxa>) Green Server: Khargulkaronarr - Troll Shadowknight of Cazic Thule - <Venerate>, Mordwin Trueheart - Human Paladin of Erollisi Marr - <Venerate>, Konquest Unrivaled - Barbarian Warrior of Rallos Zek - <Venerate> (Once Upon a Time: Alarik of the Brell Serilis server) | ||
|
Last edited by Thulghor; 08-27-2015 at 11:04 PM..
|
|
||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
|
|||
|
This is all another fake shooting like Sandy Hook. Yeah, the guys daughter gets killed and he is laughing. The hand that shoots the woman in this make up is clearly white. Then, all of a sudden...GUN CONTROL BLAH BLAH BLAH.
False Flag a l s e F l a g | ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
Notice how the cameraman is not even pointing the camera at the people...while they are INTERVIEWING! Also, Why did the BF send a tweet that the girl was dead @ 6:37 when she was killed at 6:46? Also...HOW the hell did NOBODY see this guy out of the corner of their eye? Why was NOBODY else in the area? This is so fake...and people will believe everything | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|