Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-27-2015, 09:26 AM
maskedmelon maskedmelon is offline
Planar Protector

maskedmelon's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: not far from here
Posts: 5,793
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
you probably shouldn't be willing to murder someone over a television

that's just IMO though
This is true.

Killing someone who has invaded your home is generally not recognized as murder though. And for good reason. Why should any victim be forced bear the risk of an aggressive act perpetrated by someone else? The problem is uncertainty. First the invaders motives are unknown. Second even benign motives may change upon their discovery. The invader runs the risk of prosecution if caught, so the stakes are raised in any encounter. That makes the discoverer a threat to the invader whether armed or not. Inaction by the discoverer could result in tragedy. Of course the counter argument is that action could also result in tragedy. Tragedy is tragedy, plain and simple. If we are forced to favor one side or the other though (which we are), who ought we favor? The person who has already suffered an act of aggression? Or, the person who has perpetrated that act?
  #2  
Old 08-27-2015, 02:46 PM
SlankyLanky SlankyLanky is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: bolivia
Posts: 404
Default

damn...this guy was a regular at a bar i used to goto alot. pretty sure my partner has photos of us drinking together. he was a serious conspiracy nut.
  #3  
Old 08-27-2015, 09:57 PM
Caladbolg Caladbolg is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ranndom [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Supposed shooter is a light skinned black man, shooter in video is clearly white.
Bodies are still warm, and suddenly every politician has an empty schedule and has speeches prepared to spread the gun control agenda.
Another event just going to be used to twist and divide the American people into hating each other instead of the government.
Just an fyi, gun control doesn't work. And when it does work, You're on your way to Treblinka or Belzec. Or perhaps you'll be lucky and sent to Auschwitz II.

Aside from the "definitely white shooter" thing, you're right. He was black but light skinned in the video I saw from the news, and also from his 1st person camera that he was apparently streaming.

Side by side video <--- NSFW due to graphic nature.


From his perspective (video on the right) you can see that the reporter looks over at him while he has the gun pointed at her and doesn't respond. The woman being interviewed would have seen him pointing a gun in her peripheral. He doesn't begin firing until the news cameraman pans over to her, and when he does shoot, he's aiming slightly to the left (this is done even with blanks at that range to avoid bits of potential shrapnel). The camerawoman's reaction seems rehearsed and insincere, and she didn't even stumble as she fled despite being shot several times in the chest? I can't be certain, and I doubt anyone ever will be given the way the US government operates, but I believe there's a good reason so many people are questioning the validity of this incident.


In addition, the white house was already prepared with an anti-gun speech, and Operation Jade Helm 15 (which seems to be a martial law deployment test run) is just about to wrap up on the 15th of next month.


I think the government is beginning to get sloppy.
  #4  
Old 08-28-2015, 09:23 AM
Ranndom Ranndom is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 617
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caladbolg [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Aside from the "definitely white shooter" thing, you're right. He was black but light skinned in the video I saw from the news, and also from his 1st person camera that he was apparently streaming.

Side by side video <--- NSFW due to graphic nature.


From his perspective (video on the right) you can see that the reporter looks over at him while he has the gun pointed at her and doesn't respond. The woman being interviewed would have seen him pointing a gun in her peripheral. He doesn't begin firing until the news cameraman pans over to her, and when he does shoot, he's aiming slightly to the left (this is done even with blanks at that range to avoid bits of potential shrapnel). The camerawoman's reaction seems rehearsed and insincere, and she didn't even stumble as she fled despite being shot several times in the chest? I can't be certain, and I doubt anyone ever will be given the way the US government operates, but I believe there's a good reason so many people are questioning the validity of this incident.


In addition, the white house was already prepared with an anti-gun speech, and Operation Jade Helm 15 (which seems to be a martial law deployment test run) is just about to wrap up on the 15th of next month.


I think the government is beginning to get sloppy.
Go look at all the "witnesses" and "family"
Most/All will have acting backgrounds. Little to No remorse. A little thing called Duping delight (where people who are lying about something "serious" cant help but laugh. You'll notice this a lot. They'll look away from the camera, smirk, etc while theyre in the middle of a sentence about their dead relative who died just hours ago)I guarantee it. Another thing you'll notice a lot is the colors green and purple. Couldn't tell you why, but they love green and purple when they're lying.
Sandy Hoax, All actors.
Every single one of the theater shootings, More and more actors.
Hell, 9/11 even had actors, really shitty ones at that.
Boston Bombing, Actors.
And countless other events.
Its a reoccurring pattern in every event and it only adds to the suspicion when they only interview actors that just happened to be there.
Many of them btw, have just happened to be at 2 or sometimes even 3+ of these "major events"
Now tell me, what are the chances of multiple nobodies with acting backgrounds who apparently travel the states not only witness one of these, but multiple? Its almost like they were sent there, like its their job! /gasp
  #5  
Old 08-28-2015, 11:57 AM
Caladbolg Caladbolg is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ranndom [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Go look at all the "witnesses" and "family"
Most/All will have acting backgrounds. Little to No remorse. A little thing called Duping delight (where people who are lying about something "serious" cant help but laugh. You'll notice this a lot. They'll look away from the camera, smirk, etc while theyre in the middle of a sentence about their dead relative who died just hours ago)I guarantee it. Another thing you'll notice a lot is the colors green and purple. Couldn't tell you why, but they love green and purple when they're lying.
Sandy Hoax, All actors.
Every single one of the theater shootings, More and more actors.
Hell, 9/11 even had actors, really shitty ones at that.
Boston Bombing, Actors.
And countless other events.
Its a reoccurring pattern in every event and it only adds to the suspicion when they only interview actors that just happened to be there.
Many of them btw, have just happened to be at 2 or sometimes even 3+ of these "major events"
Now tell me, what are the chances of multiple nobodies with acting backgrounds who apparently travel the states not only witness one of these, but multiple? Its almost like they were sent there, like its their job! /gasp
Oh I don't doubt it. One instance of crisis actors that really stands out in my mind is from the boston bombing. She's doing pretty well for having been killed during the alleged Sandy Hook shooting (that didn't even happen at Sandy Hook Elementary. It was a catholic school nearby)[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]


All of these things precede some sort of push by the government to gain sympathy for whatever agenda they have.

This most recent incident, combined with the BLM riots and the threat of them spreading, the winding down of Jade Helm, and the already prepared speech that proceeded the shooting in Virginia, I'm a bit worried what they're planning. They're actually trying to start a race war for some political agenda. It makes me feel a little better that they're being so sloppy about it though. It kind of seems like they want to incite riots everywhere and disarm everyone who legally owns a gun so that the military 'has to move in and control the situations'. I'm not sure why though. Most everyone is already obedient and pays their taxes.
  #6  
Old 08-27-2015, 11:02 PM
Thulghor Thulghor is offline
Fire Giant

Thulghor's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oggok, Antonica
Posts: 532
Send a message via AIM to Thulghor Send a message via MSN to Thulghor Send a message via Yahoo to Thulghor
Default

We have a mental health and social class problem (border lining on caste system and corporate oligarchy). Not specifically a "black problem." People of all fruity flavors commit violent crimes.

Also, there is an incentive system for the prison industry to incarcerate people.
__________________
Thulghor Skullgrinder (Blue Server)
Ogre Champion
Soldier of Rallos Zek
<The Second Sons> (former member of <Vesica Dei>, <Evoluxa>)

Green Server: Khargulkaronarr - Troll Shadowknight of Cazic Thule - <Venerate>, Mordwin Trueheart - Human Paladin of Erollisi Marr - <Venerate>, Konquest Unrivaled - Barbarian Warrior of Rallos Zek - <Venerate>

(Once Upon a Time: Alarik of the Brell Serilis server)
Last edited by Thulghor; 08-27-2015 at 11:04 PM..
  #7  
Old 08-28-2015, 09:26 AM
Ranndom Ranndom is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 617
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thulghor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
We have a mental health and social class problem (border lining on caste system and corporate oligarchy). Not specifically a "black problem." People of all fruity flavors commit violent crimes.

Also, there is an incentive system for the prison industry to incarcerate people.
Less than 15% of the population makes up 85%+ of the crime. Its a black problem. A very profitable "problem" for the prison systems which is why police have gotten so bad
  #8  
Old 08-28-2015, 09:25 AM
Bigtokes Bigtokes is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 73
Default

This is all another fake shooting like Sandy Hook. Yeah, the guys daughter gets killed and he is laughing. The hand that shoots the woman in this make up is clearly white. Then, all of a sudden...GUN CONTROL BLAH BLAH BLAH.

False Flag
a
l
s
e

F
l
a
g
  #9  
Old 08-28-2015, 09:27 AM
Ranndom Ranndom is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 617
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtokes [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is all another fake shooting like Sandy Hook. Yeah, the guys daughter gets killed and he is laughing. The hand that shoots the woman in this make up is clearly white. Then, all of a sudden...GUN CONTROL BLAH BLAH BLAH.

False Flag
a
l
s
e

F
l
a
g
I was wrong on the hand thing. Its definitely a light skinned guy. between my angle of the screen and the videos lighting it just looked white
  #10  
Old 08-28-2015, 09:30 AM
Bigtokes Bigtokes is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 73
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ranndom [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I was wrong on the hand thing. Its definitely a light skinned guy. between my angle of the screen and the videos lighting it just looked white
I'm Mr. Meseeks, look at me!

Notice how the cameraman is not even pointing the camera at the people...while they are INTERVIEWING!

Also, Why did the BF send a tweet that the girl was dead @ 6:37 when she was killed at 6:46?

Also...HOW the hell did NOBODY see this guy out of the corner of their eye?

Why was NOBODY else in the area?

This is so fake...and people will believe everything
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:41 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.