![]() |
|
#74
|
||||
|
Quote:
Also, wow...thought the staff here took RL attacks pretty seriously. Alarti and Tiggles both should get forum/in-game bans for their offenses in this thread.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid Barlow - 60 monk Blueberrii - 60 Mage Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman Kids - 60 Rogue Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric | |||
|
|
||||
|
#75
|
|||
|
gigglepurr?
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#76
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() | |||
|
|
||||
|
#77
|
|||
|
im sure the mods would love to ban ppl for RL attacks
but its the cool thing to do now and everones doin it, i think i recall a couple mod posts incl rl attacks lately too shit was classic | ||
|
|
|||
|
#78
|
|||
|
ya it is p sad/pathetic when you get dunked on so hard in forumquest that you immediately jump to "oh yeah? well you just got out of jail for stealing toothbrushes!"
like... what?? | ||
|
|
|||
|
#79
|
|||
|
it might also be because red forum posters are experienced career forum posters
seems the rules bend so its not a rl attack if u can slightly hide it with some semblance of a joke.. even though its obv what people mean. they dig in that plausible deniability and mods got weak spines on the ban trigger these days imo. also they seem to step back from the rules and not give a shit about rl attacks when the attack in question is a true story or they believe it to be so, which is literally the only rl attack people should be banned for. plus posts come so fast i dont think any one person can read all of this unless their job is boring enough to allow them to forumquest at work | ||
|
Last edited by bubur; 07-19-2015 at 02:32 AM..
|
|
||
|
#80
|
|||
|
also i have sex with dogs
whats up with that | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|