An open letter to GM staff regarding MQs

[Champion_Standing]

But hey if they disabled epic MQs people might actually have to do the quests instead of EZ moding it by tunnel ratting or exploiting to get a fungi.

[Cecily]

Originally Posted by Champion_Standing [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But hey if they disabled epic MQs people might actually have to do the quests instead of EZ moding it by tunnel ratting or exploiting to get a fungi.

50+ for epic turn ins or item eaten needs to happen, after I run a few rogue MQs on red at least.

[PVP Cleric]

PM me if you want me to let you know a game you can play where you get to be the one hero the world needs every time you log in without any other pesky players obstructing you with their "greed."

[DeadlyReza]

Ok here is a scenario that is against this.

I have 4 level 60 characters. I have been playing since p99 server opened. I have already been through so many epic runs...

I also have more cash than I know what to do with

Should my precious hard work be put aside because someone is complaining that I have more pixels than them?

MQing is classic, it's not like you can get an epic for 10k, I know rogues are 30k but you would be looking at 70k for a cleric and god knows what else for the rest... I think it would be cool to limit level for epic turn ins though, that's a sweet idea

[Laugher]

Had the same thing happen to a friend here a couple years ago. Quest is best really, and besides its the official way of The Vision™

[kremlar]

No real opinion on the two requests, there is just something that confused me about the preamble: Do people really not use trusted third parties on this server?

Buyer hands the money to some known neutral party. Buyer & seller go off to perform whatever service was on offer. Neutral party takes their cut and gives the rest to the seller.

Protects both sides from shenanagins and doesn't require anything from GMs.

[Swish]

Originally Posted by kremlar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No real opinion on the two requests, there is just something that confused me about the preamble: Do people really not use trusted third parties on this server?

Buyer hands the money to some known neutral party. Buyer & seller go off to perform whatever service was on offer. Neutral party takes their cut and gives the rest to the seller.

Protects both sides from shenanagins and doesn't require anything from GMs.

Hagglebaron used to run an escrow type service. I used it when I sold my first account here. Since the account selling was banned its had less of a reason to be around.

The problem these days, as the neutral third party there's every chance you're handling dirty plat and are going to catch a suspension for it.

[Morlaeth]

OP, name and shame the person from the reputable raiding guild.

[ppdanny]

Originally Posted by Morlaeth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

OP, name and shame the person from the reputable raiding guild.

This isnt RnF thanks

[Morlaeth]

Originally Posted by ppdanny [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This isnt RnF thanks

Though by your own admission you know you were flirting with the RNF line. The staff have seen these types of requests a ton in the past. I don't disagree with your stance, either.

The community might be more realistically served, since the staff probably won't change their stance on this, by knowing who the person who cheated you is.