Interesting old (but relevant) EQ web paper - Page 3

Taluvill · #1 12-15-2010, 11:40 PM

My bad, didnt read your post thoroughly. Regardless, that would still kickass. Im still torn about whether beastlords should completely just go, but its whatev.

Rahnza · #2 12-16-2010, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taluvill [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My bad, didnt read your post thoroughly. Regardless, that would still kickass. Im still torn about whether beastlords should completely just go, but its whatev.

They could become relevant with some customization. Berserkers are completely hopeless.

Henini · #3 12-16-2010, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taluvill [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

beastlords should completely just go

bst can slow, so they are still relevent on live today. + they do ok dps

Not that i'd ever play one, to me they just don't fit-in in EQ. but like you said, whateva

Henini · #4 12-16-2010, 05:10 PM

yes, I double posted... .wait tripple

Levon · #5 12-16-2010, 02:17 PM

It's just a bunch of min/maxer whiney bullshit.

I think I had 100 days /played on my primary character by the time I dinged 50.

Mosharm · #6 12-16-2010, 03:51 PM

I echo Chanus's response, it was different back then. Few people knew what quest was what. There were no maps or guides. It took me a few hours just to get out of Ak'Anon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]. Then once I was out I just ran around trying to see all the sights.
I just looked up my first toon and only made level 45 after 72 days [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]. As a side note it looks like I was the 18th Enchanter on Fennin.
http://eqplayers.station.sony.com/ch...d=472446568127

Chanus · #7 12-16-2010, 03:52 PM

At one point I was the #3 Dwarf Cleric, excluding max level characters, on the Nameless.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Henini · #8 12-16-2010, 04:02 PM

reading this article , I couldn't help but thinking that guy never made it to 60 and probably not even to 55.
his point of views and comments are very "noobish"

2-3 days per dungeon?

c'mon there are more then 2-3 camps per dungeon first off.

you could spend a month in seb and still not have worn out the novelty of the place, cuz you go from one camp to an other, and it's so big.

sorry but 58+ doing reets and juggs, is really something the first couple of times. Even doing shroom king...

anyways...

Rahnza · #9 12-16-2010, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Henini [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

reading this article , I couldn't help but thinking that guy never made it to 60 and probably not even to 55.
his point of views and comments are very "noobish"

2-3 days per dungeon?

c'mon there are more then 2-3 camps per dungeon first off.

you could spend a month in seb and still not have worn out the novelty of the place, cuz you go from one camp to an other, and it's so big.

sorry but 58+ doing reets and juggs, is really something the first couple of times. Even doing shroom king...

anyways...

It's Thott haha.

Henini · #10 12-16-2010, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rahnza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's Thott haha.

and?

anyone that says after 2-3 nights in seb there is no more to see has some serious issues.

That's the problem with kunark.

I don't care who you are or what you have done. and if you been in seb you know what I'm talking about.