This Server Cannot Handle Zerg v Zerg

[Runya]

88+mobs actually

[Supaskillz]

You must construct additional pylons

[Outer]

Colgate you have to be the most immature leader on this server. Never anything constructive to contribute.

[derpcake]

Originally Posted by Supaskillz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You must construct additional pylons

18 overlords in queue ftw

[Littlegyno 13.0]

upgraded teamspeak to 250.

prepare ur anuses 4 velly empire yowl.

[Tickle-me-tiggle]

Originally Posted by Guido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Need opinions here - if server cannot handle zerg numbers - great idea from Guide Chroma to let a 30v30 determine who wins the dragon

Funny thing is on a real 'PvP' server this was essentially how things were done. Honor code fighting, you brought a raid size. Usually 30-60 people, and then fought in a neutral zone outside of the raid.

For example if you wanted to fight for Trakanon, you didn't fight in Sebilis where one idiot training could decide the fate of the PvP, you'd fight in EJ Near Trakanon zone.

Or when we used to fight for Plane of Time (before it was instanced) we would fight in the entrance of BoThunder or PoTactics.

If we were fighting over Tunare we always met in Great divide outside of Thurgadin, it was all good PvP and both sides won sometimes.

I think unfortunately, on this server...this would never happen, for a lot of reasons. Primarily because it probably can't be agreed to.

But the idea was, if you are currently able to field the better PvP force on the PvP server, then you deserved the raid. However, over time this broke down when instances became the norm, it didn't really matter...and the pvp servers died.

[Zalaerian]

Lol WTf handholding live server shit were playing on. There were always trains. Seb, TOV, Ssra.

PDM sending rogues into emp chamber with no more intention then to break mezes on the 6 guards, and xp kill chanters/clerics, was common practice

[Tickle-me-tiggle]

Originally Posted by Zalaerian [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol WTf handholding live server shit were playing on. There were always trains. Seb, TOV, Ssra.

PDM sending rogues into emp chamber with no more intention then to break mezes on the 6 guards, and xp kill chanters/clerics, was common practice

Not TZ if you were against pande, I was on VZ/RZ from classic to PoP - the agreement always was bring your 30-60 best if it's guild v guild, fight and whoever wins gets the raid. If it was more than 2 guilds (happened a lot) it was FFA until one guild was left in zone.

Zone crashes were constant, and mobs like RZ rarely ever died due to idiots training so this is the agreement they came to.

[FaithlessKR]

Originally Posted by Tickle-me-tiggle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not TZ if you were against pande, I was on VZ/RZ from classic to PoP - the agreement always was bring your 30-60 best if it's guild v guild, fight and whoever wins gets the raid. If it was more than 2 guilds (happened a lot) it was FFA until one guild was left in zone.

Zone crashes were constant, and mobs like RZ rarely ever died due to idiots training so this is the agreement they came to.

This is why Pande won at zek merger. They knew how to keep people down on tz and did it to everyone else after servers merged too. Agreements are for blubies.

[Tickle-me-tiggle]

Originally Posted by FaithlessKR [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is why Pande won at zek merger. They knew how to keep people down on tz and did it to everyone else after servers merged too. Agreements are for blubies.

Pande was the guild that openly MQ'd tho, no? They said if everyone else was going to do it and try to hide it they were just going to abuse it, They didn't even get in that much trouble...just a couple of warp suspensions.