Possible Return

[Smedy]

Originally Posted by Kergan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your brain must be as larger than mine because I saw "allowed to pvp but if you're sole intent is to disrupt that isn't allowed".

I am now somewhat brain boggled

its a loop hole though, you can always say your intent is to pvp, and thats that

surely there will be lot of mad 45 year olds and jews throwing donations to have it otherwise though, i hope kringe brings a crew, this box could use some zone cmd right now

[Smedy]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

1) yes you can pvp players that are engaged with a mob so long as you arent on LNS.

2) if your purpose is to disrupt, then you're probably guilty of zone disruption. if your purpose is to pvp, then its not disruption, so long as you follow LNS afterwards.

3) you can try to rule lawyer, but ill enforce the spirit of the rule regardless of how you try to twist/lawyer the words.

saved for future, its time kringe, bring da deep south bros back dawg, clean the lands of these bluebie scums

[dis_mornin]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

3) you can try to rule lawyer, but ill enforce the spirit of the rule regardless of how you try to twist/lawyer the words.

KeK

[Kergan]

How did Sirken directly answer the question yet I have the exact same questions as before.

I think what Kringe is asking is if you are attacking an enemy raid without a reasonable sized force to have a chance to win the PVP or PVE encounter, with the sole purpose of making it so they wipe to the raid target - is that considered zone disruption?

[Kringe]

Originally Posted by Kergan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How did Sirken directly answer the question yet I have the exact same questions as before.

I think what Kringe is asking is if you are attacking an enemy raid without a reasonable sized force to have a chance to win the PVP or PVE encounter, with the sole purpose of making it so they wipe to the raid target - is that considered zone disruption?

Actually Kergan is correct, I didn't want to confuse you Sirken.. Quoting Kergan verbatim, is this considered "zone disruption"?

If it is then I guess red99 is really blue99 with a "red label".... Because on RZ this was a common tactic to stall and try and recruit opposing members of said zerg to switch over.

[Kergan]

I have this feeling the "spirit of the rule" is that if you aren't trying to take the PVE target, and your primary objective is to wipe a raid - that is going to be considered disruption.

Refreshing every 5 seconds until we get an official word.

[Kringe]

Originally Posted by Kergan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have this feeling the "spirit of the rule" is that if you aren't trying to take the PVE target, and your primary objective is to wipe a raid - that is going to be considered disruption.

Refreshing every 5 seconds until we get an official word.

Ya that's kind of the "grey area" we would like confirmation on.

[Colgate]

i'll be moving into sirken's home for velious so that i will have direct access to GM assistance

just try and attack me while i am engaged with a raid mob

i dare you

[Kergan]

This is going to be like the civil war with brothers fighting brothers.

[Buhbuh]

He's asking if him and his small group of pals can grief Holocaust's raids without fear of being punished for it.

Let's not doll up the language. Call it what it is.

Should come back and try at least once. You're not gonna ever play here again otherwise. Why not go out in a blaze of glory?