Possible Return

[Kringe]

Originally Posted by magician [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

kringe old man go back to elfpals u aint allowed near holohq

Grownups are talking bert.


I think a new DAOC server is opening soon for you.

[daasgoot]

crazycloud, retarded or trolling?

[Samsung]

Originally Posted by daasgoot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

crazycloud, retarded or trolling?

Retarded

[LostCause]

beta doesn't count as knowing velious gl with pvp coming at you.

[Kergan]

:O

[Complexity]

mmmmm love me some Kringe.

[Sirken]

Originally Posted by Kringe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also would like to verify Play nice policy... With Sirken/Gms

Are you allowed to engage a raid force on said mob with a small number of people to prevent them from raiding or is this considered harassment..


IE - Holocaust attempting Lord Vyemm in Tov.... We bring a small group to disrupt them from killing said mob just for the simple please of disrupting.. Is this legal or considered harassment?


Trying to gather if the rule lawyering would even be worth our time.

1) yes you can pvp players that are engaged with a mob so long as you arent on LNS.

2) if your purpose is to disrupt, then you're probably guilty of zone disruption. if your purpose is to pvp, then its not disruption, so long as you follow LNS afterwards.

3) you can try to rule lawyer, but ill enforce the spirit of the rule regardless of how you try to twist/lawyer the words.

[Kringe]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

1) yes you can pvp players that are engaged with a mob so long as you arent on LNS.

2) if your purpose is to disrupt, then you're probably guilty of zone disruption. if your purpose is to pvp, then its not disruption, so long as you follow LNS afterwards.

3) you can try to rule lawyer, but ill enforce the spirit of the rule regardless of how you try to twist/lawyer the words.

Awesome I had heard that if you engage people in Velious on mobs, that if you do not bring a raid force able to take said mob that it would follow under the "harassment rule" and or "experience loss".. We would come to pvp but wanted it clarified so as people aren't eating bans/suspensions for attacking.

Thanks for the clarification

[Kergan]

Originally Posted by Kringe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Awesome I had heard that if you engage people in Velious on mobs, that if you do not bring a raid force able to take said mob that it would follow under the "harassment rule" and or "experience loss".. We would come to pvp but wanted it clarified so as people aren't eating bans/suspensions for attacking.

Thanks for the clarification

Your brain must be as larger than mine because I saw "allowed to pvp but if you're sole intent is to disrupt that isn't allowed".

I am now somewhat brain boggled

[vinnidel]

Originally Posted by Kergan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your brain must be as larger than mine because I saw "allowed to pvp but if you're sole intent is to disrupt that isn't allowed".

I am now somewhat brain boggled

im sorry to say I agree with Kergan.

Once again Sirken tries to answer a question, misses the subtlety, and fails to answer the question.

Project 1999.