Raid Suspension: TMO (Again)

[ClownGuild]

Originally Posted by Ravager [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

TMO is upset that it's getting harder to leapfrog guilds and trivialize content.

Uhm no. Both guilds do the same thing. Seriously. IB did it to kill PD on the last repop. So they are likely going to get suspended as well if this ruling holds up.

[arsenalpow]

Originally Posted by ClownGuild [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think a better rule for VP would be (Since it is unique with the number of targets and pathing)

There's nothing unique. It's another everquest zone with stuff to kill. TMO/IB have created this raid atmosphere where it's just SOP to train everything away every time then zerg the target and hopefully win. Then if you don't successfully down the target a train comes back and eats everyone. Hate, Fear, VS, Trak, VP, and as of Sunday Vox are all train and kill targets.

Yes, it's faster, I get it, but your "raid strategy" shouldn't be able to impede someone else's attempt. You're free to execute whatever strategy you deem fit for the target but if it interferes with an opposing raid force in any way it should be punished. Even if you're just moving the dragon out of the way and recusing yourself from going after the target it's still interfering with IB's attempt right? You have to at least acknowledge that.

[ClownGuild]

Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There's nothing unique. It's another everquest zone with stuff to kill. TMO/IB have created this raid atmosphere where it's just SOP to train everything away every time then zerg the target and hopefully win. Then if you don't successfully down the target a train comes back and eats everyone. Hate, Fear, VS, Trak, VP, and as of Sunday Vox are all train and kill targets.

Yes, it's faster, I get it, but your "raid strategy" shouldn't be able to impede someone else's attempt. You're free to execute whatever strategy you deem fit for the target but if it interferes with an opposing raid force in any way it should be punished. Even if you're just moving the dragon out of the way and recusing yourself from going after the target it's still interfering with IB's attempt right? You have to at least acknowledge that.

False. If you wipe to the dragon nothing comes back. If you actually raided VP you could speak on this topic. Just stay quiet and don't look foolish.

[Troubled]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[arsenalpow]

Originally Posted by ClownGuild [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Uhm no. Both guilds do the same thing. Seriously. IB did it to kill PD on the last repop. So they are likely going to get suspended as well if this ruling holds up.

Also doesn't make it ok. Tit for tat isn't a defense.

Just think of how stupid this would be if Taken and BDA were forcefully put in class C. 4-5 guilds in VP sounds like some nightmare scenario.

[Troubled]

How could Sirken do this to Tiggles?

[Tiggles]

Originally Posted by Troubled [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How could Sirken do this to Tiggles?

[Swish]

Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also doesn't make it ok. Tit for tat isn't a defense.

Just think of how stupid this would be if Taken and BDA were forcefully put in class C. 4-5 guilds in VP sounds like some nightmare scenario.

Better play it safe Chest, stick with what you know.

[Swish]

GL to <Asgard> on next Class C spawns <3

[Ravager]

I bet Sirken giggles when Tiggles wriggles.