shit's goin down!

[Mendo]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I will say one thing though. The fact that Deru and Sirken conduct most of their business on Skype should really worry you about the fair application of rules on the server.

The best thing that could happen would be a public forum that is readable by all where decisions and evidence can be presented. There should also be a GM who checks when GM's query what time mobs may spawn.

Just do it!
I need some RnF entertainment today.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Mendo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just do it!
I need some RnF entertainment today.

There is no value... all leaking truth does is get you banned. That isn't to say that everyone who is banned was leaking truth.

This will continue to be the case for as long as our admins conduct backdoor deals without making the "legal trial system" public.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Susvain2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Kunark been out long enough. IB and TMO should just rotate mobs with each other till Velious. I mean it comes out 50/50 when you average it out anyway

But how would we update our front-pages?

[Merekai]

Originally Posted by Susvain2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Question. Who the hell can follow Lazie/Phats argument? I tried but it makes me want to kill myself for participating in this raid scene

HAHAHA! My thoughts exactly.

Chev

[Racun]

Originally Posted by Lazie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You are responsible for the aggro of the mob once you aggro it. You kited Hoshkar for 6+ minutes and we could not pull him. We knew Sirken was in zone so we decided to pull the Dragons that weren't engaged to be safe. Sirken saw Layze shout he was Dropping Hoshkar right after Druushk got FTE'd. I know he understand aggro mechanics as well.

If this is what you really believe then you admit responsibility for Trak aggroing anyone on the ledge.

[Lazie]

Originally Posted by Racun [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If this is what you really believe then you admit responsibility for Trak aggroing anyone on the ledge.

This is the point. They are arguing that for Trak. However, they are trying to say that isn't the case in VP for 2 things that happened yesterday. I was just pointing out the hypocrisy.

[ssfarmer]

Originally Posted by Racun [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If this is what you really believe then you admit responsibility for Trak aggroing anyone on the ledge.

umm this has never been in question..... tmo has always accepted that the aggro was on us.

what we have used as a defense is that this rule has never been enforced and neither side has ever petitioned it before (as far as i know at least), and the fact that we never attempted a 2nd engage but just CRed (IB was going to be at a bag limit after trak so there was no need to hurry to go anywhere else, so we could take our time, and we helped taken out while we did it)

[Aadill]

Originally Posted by Susvain2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Question. Who the hell can follow Lazie/Phats argument? I tried but it makes me want to kill myself for participating in this raid scene

I gave up before it started.

[arsenalpow]

goddamn shadowbane was terrrrrrible