Raid Rule Madness

[Hitpoint]

To clarify further. If BDA didn't have a tracker of their own, they could have helped Taken kill Naggy and it would have been fine. There is no rule against helping other guilds. There is a rule about numbers of trackers allowed past the zone in. Which is the issue here.

[chief]

Actually helping to kill any raid mob is against the rules if you guys have more then allocated trackers in zone.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by chief [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Actually helping to kill any raid mob is against the rules if you guys have more then allocated trackers in zone.

only when TMO does this:

Originally Posted by Godefroi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Locust]

i'll let you guys finish about bda and naggy

but..

do you remember when taken killed severilous without fte and the GMs didn't care?

do you remember when catherin rubbed it in our faces?

do you remember when we played by the rules and got burned?

do you remember when your guild got suspended for breaking the rules?

do you remember when taken didn't?

[Hitpoint]

Originally Posted by Locust [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

do you remember when taken didn't?

Never forget

[Hitpoint]

Bda*

That actually was not on purpose.

[Fazlazen]

poor BDA...

[Man0warr]

Except Taken and BDA weren't teamed up. No loot was split, no words were shared.

[Samoht]

^ no where in those rules does it say that a second guild cannot punch a mob at the end for fun.

[Locust]

this argument has been exhausted. can we get back on track please?

at least the BDA punishment points to a rule, whether one side believes they broke it or not.

like Fael said earlier, GMs looked the other way for an even more blatant rule violation in Taken's killing of Severilous, which is why both the naggy ruling and sev ruling are extremely confusing for the rest of the raiding population