Taken - Sev

[dustysr06]

I think eratani is to blame for all of this, should send him massive amounts of hate tells in game..

Or you know, u could come play red, where fte doesnt matter and the players can exact their own revenge and due justice! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Signal]

Originally Posted by Abs [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Still should be a punishment for taking the law into their own hands in my opinion, if not the entire guild definitely the sole person responsible for creating the mess that ensued

There is no question that Catherin broke rules here. It is just using the GM's lack of knowledge about these encounters and how people get on the hate list as justification for it's cheating.

[Hitpoint]

Originally Posted by Signal [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There is no question that Catherin broke rules here. It is just using the GM's lack of knowledge about these encounters and how people get on the hate list as justification for it's cheating.

It's not lack of knowledge. They definitely know how this stuff works.

We gave up a week of VP, and had the loot of 4 dragons deleted, over an EXTREMELY arguable, and non-malicious rules violation. In what was essentially a grey area of the rules which had not been ruled on, or explored before. Then compare that to this situation. Where Taken maliciously chooses to break the rules and absolutely nothing happens. I think they just want to give Taken a pass for some reason. That's fine I guess. But next time someone in my guild makes an honest mistake I hope they use the same consideration, rather than suspending us for a week.

[Locust]

Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think they just want to give Taken a pass for some reason. That's fine I guess. But next time someone in my guild makes an honest mistake I hope they use the same consideration, rather than suspending us for a week.

this is why everyone is upset about the ruling. if rules aren't consistently enforced, what's the point of having them?

could you imagine the uproar if TMO had killed Severilous instead of Taken?

do you think you guys would have gotten off as easily?

[Hitpoint]

Originally Posted by Locust [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

this is why everyone is upset about the ruling. if rules aren't consistently enforced, what's the point of having them?

could you imagine the uproar if TMO had killed Severilous instead of Taken?

do you think you guys would have gotten off as easily?

If the last ruling against us is any indication of punishment severity; we would probably have been disbanded and officer core all banned.