An effort to make the pvp server more fun for everybody

[no chewie dont]

Not sure what red's average player needs more: variance or employment

[Jib]

Originally Posted by no chewie dont [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not sure what red's average player needs more: variance or employment

lol'd

[derpcake]

Originally Posted by no chewie dont [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not sure what red's average player needs more: variance or employment

I guess you are a funny guy after all.

[Pikrib]

Originally Posted by no chewie dont [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not sure what red's average player needs more: variance or employment

employment

[Feniggles]

Originally Posted by no chewie dont [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not sure what red's average player needs more: variance or employment

MOAR MERBS

[Clark]

Originally Posted by no chewie dont [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not sure what red's average player needs more: variance or employment

[billpaleq]

So the argument is keep it how it is so Nihilium or the next top guild can keep server dominance or put in variance that will give another guild(s) a slightly better chance to grab a high end raid target?

[Jib]

variance = even playing field, lots more pvp, lots more population, lots more casual players 300-600 pop

no variance = stale server. no pvp. 1 dominant zerg guild. shitty server. 50-150 pop

[Gaffin 7.0]

variance or simulated repops which is it you want? imo variance is retarded and only makes things worse

[Kergan]

Originally Posted by Jib [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

variance = even playing field, lots more pvp, lots more population, lots more casual players 300-600 pop

no variance = stale server. no pvp. 1 dominant zerg guild. shitty server. 50-150 pop

200+ pop in primetime now. If you can get 400 people to reply to this post saying they'd play consistently if we added variance I'll change my stance. Until then you're just making up random numbers based on false assumptions.