![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
- Oppressor
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Jack <Yael Graduates> - Server First Erudite
Bush <Toxic> Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue | |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
yikes talk about a greedy player
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
With any leaderboard it is in your best interest to kill the weakest players.
So not sure if srs or dum. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
When you get a small fraction of the points for killing weak players versus good ones, it's not really in your interest.
ya moran
__________________
Jack <Yael Graduates> - Server First Erudite
Bush <Toxic> Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue | ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
Small fraction of points is more or less than 0 just so I can get it straight?
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
Go spend your time killing the bottom 100 on the board and see how far it gets you in rankings.
__________________
Jack <Yael Graduates> - Server First Erudite
Bush <Toxic> Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue | ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
Bet I'll be higher than if I killed none of them.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
You really going to come here and argue semantics with me? I wouldn't consider spending my time killing a bunch of low-value scrubs to be in my interest when I could be hunting medium and high-value people who are worth 5x the points per kill - for those of us who don't have unlimited time, anyways.
ya moran
__________________
Jack <Yael Graduates> - Server First Erudite
Bush <Toxic> Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue | ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
i luv when nizzar posts on the forums, reminds me of the humiliation he suffered at the monk best of the best
haha 8) | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|