Taken - Sky Scumbags

[zanderklocke]

The problem is that people are putting too many stipulations in what their agreement policy is. Honestly, I think the policy for the time being should just be "No one will kill OOAs." That's really all you need, and more can get figured out as time goes on. This will guarantee more Efreetis on the server than the situation that is happening right now.

In my opinion, it's the other stipulations that are bogging down the process of agreeing to not kill OOAs because not all guilds agree on those aspects being brought up.

[Ciroco]

Originally Posted by zanderklocke [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think the policy for the time being should just be "No one will kill OOAs."

Lord Bob says no because more loot is bad and working with other players makes the game too easy, or something along those lines. I have a feeling everyone else could pressure them into agreeing if they were the only dissenting guild, but it looks like we've already descended into Sky anarchy.

[Hitpoint]

Originally Posted by Ciroco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lord Bob says no because more loot is bad and working with other players makes the game too easy, or something along those lines. I have a feeling everyone else could pressure them into agreeing if they were the only dissenting guild, but it looks like we've already descended into Sky anarchy.

Lord Bob probably can't even kill an Overseer. This is a non issue.

[Hitpoint]

I don't understand why Overseer is such a valued mob that people choose to put their guild in a position like this. It's just one shitty Overseer, just fucking leave him up a couple times. Who cares if someone else kills it, that's their problem. Do you want a rotation or not?

[Artaenc]

Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't understand why Overseer is such a valued mob that people choose to put their guild in a position like this. It's just one shitty Overseer, just fucking leave him up a couple times. Who cares if someone else kills it, that's their problem. Do you want a rotation or not?

some guilds can't see past pixels, it can be compared to an animal that has blinders on.

[Kingore]

Originally Posted by Artaenc [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

some guilds can't see past pixels, it can be compared to an animal that has blinders on.

My favorite part is that Catherine plays the victim here, OMG WHO KILLED THE OOA LAST WEEK THAT IS THE REAL ISSUE. When they do the same thing and refuse to admit what they did was wrong.

As soon as I found out that the OOA was going to be killed, please note HOURS after they knew TMO left it up and couldn't even be man enough to kill it in front of us, I immediately contacted a TMO officer to plead them to stop. Taken refused letting us know that pixels were more important.

[Detoxx]

In light of Taken's repeated actions regarding the Overseers, TMO sees no reason to abide by the former agreement that was in place. We came to Taken yesterday with reason, suggesting that they are in a critical position to either stand down and be part of the solution by setting a precedent and not engaging or they could continue to exacerbate the problem by continuing to kill OoA's. Unfortunately, Taken chose the former.

In response, TMO will now begin keeping noble timer and engaging Noble as an FFA target and continuing on with the freeti cycle (Noble>Overseer>Hand) until further notice. We apologize in this unfortunate circumstance, but if we are to accept Taken's logic as to why they killed Overseer's than we must treat this situation in concordance to that line of rationale.

[Heebo]

Originally Posted by Detoxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

In light of Taken's repeated actions regarding the Overseers, TMO sees no reason to abide by the former agreement that was in place. We came to Taken yesterday with reason, suggesting that they are in a critical position to either stand down and be part of the solution by setting a precedent and not engaging or they could continue to exacerbate the problem by continuing to kill OoA's. Unfortunately, Taken chose the former.

In response, TMO will now begin keeping noble timer and engaging Noble as an FFA target and continuing on with the freeti cycle (Noble>Overseer>Hand) until further notice. We apologize in this unfortunate circumstance, but if we are to accept Taken's logic as to why they killed Overseer's than we must treat this situation in concordance to that line of rationale.

This man does not speak for TMO. Until you hear otherwise by an officer, TMO will not be engaging OOAs.

Dear Taken - it doesn't matter who killed the OOA before you did. Stop being fuckwits and either agree or reject the proposal not kill OOAs. If your actions continue you can rest assured that you will not be happy with the outcome.

[Detoxx]

Originally Posted by Heebo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This man does not speak for TMO. Until you hear otherwise by an officer, TMO will not be engaging OOAs.

Dear Taken - it doesn't matter who killed the OOA before you did. Stop being fuckwits and either agree or reject the proposal not kill OOAs. If your actions continue you can rest assured that you will not be happy with the outcome.

That was a quote, from an officer, in raid section.

[Heebo]

Originally Posted by Detoxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That was a quote, from an officer, in raid section.

My bad. Looks like the agreement's nuked.

Wonder which alt I'll get to equip in full golden plate because of Taken...