Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-01-2014, 08:32 PM
kenzar kenzar is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 455
Default

more desync than wipe
__________________
Original Minyin
Original Tattersail
  #2  
Old 04-01-2014, 08:35 PM
Jarnauga Jarnauga is offline
Fire Giant

Jarnauga's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 944
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
When have we struggled with Hoshkar ? We had a complete desync on him when you guys camped out during an engage. The rest of the time we have engaged Hosh we killed him with minimal losses. You guys still struggle to get dps to login to kill the dragons you pull.

This is literally the truth.. There was more respect from TMO leadership shown than from Getsome. From the first conversations they were the more reasonable and even minded people that discussed things with our leadership. It makes a difference. Respect goes a long way. IB has some great players so don't take what I say as disrespect. But if it comes to being absorbed it is the weaker option overall especially when the leadership is giving literally zero respect during discussion or concessions to make things easier for everyone to accept. Simple answer for merging Velious is on the horizon our goal was always to form the strongest guild we could.

When IB slammed the door via Getsome thinking we had to accept his terms or else and we wouldn't and he basically quit discussions because of his stubborness. It made the decision easy. People in our guild let go of their grudges to do what was best for everyone going forward. They were reasonable even though it was hard for a few of the members to let go of some things. It's saying a lot when those same members were unwilling to except IB's, terms but would work with TMO.
But why not co-leader of TMO though ?
__________________
BLUE: Jarnauga Winterfell - Barbarian Shaman of The Tribunal

GREEN: Ineluki - Human Shadow Knight of Inoruuk


lulz
  #3  
Old 04-01-2014, 09:27 PM
Byrjun Byrjun is offline
Planar Protector

Byrjun's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That's the thing IB expected us to just accept being absorbed and accept unreasonable terms.
The same exact unreasonable terms that TMO gave you, which suddenly became reasonable. 'Cause 70 man zerg raids and loot and shit, hell yea.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #4  
Old 04-01-2014, 07:08 PM
Ravager Ravager is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,731
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Come on guys, we raided together for months during FE/Ib's alliance.

Truth: Before Getsome disrespected every member of FE by continually renegotiating the terms of our merger, we were all pretty close buds. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]


So you all have to realize how easy it is for former friends to see through your bullshit posts and see how mad/jelly you guys are, right? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]


Truth: You guys fucked up...and now you're paying the price for your pride. All this smear campaign is going to accomplish is embarrassment for you and your guildies. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]


Give it up while you're ahead.


Good luck in velious, IB. I hope that all the loot FE was gracious enough to share with you when you would show up with 1/5th of our raid forces numbers and refused to track anything continues to help you out moving forward. We treated you as equals, and let you have a fair shake on loot almost every single raid. You guys repaid us with disrespect and more or less backstabbed us when it mattered most, but I still consider many of you my friends. I only feel sorry for those of you without the guts to abandon the ones in your guild who've put you in the position to be unsuccessful.
As an outsider who thinks competition in a PvE game is stupid as hell, yet a minority of the population insists that it happens, I'm wondering why a merger with anyone was a necessity? What was wrong with 3 guilds competing when competition is what those three guilds claimed to want?
  #5  
Old 04-01-2014, 07:11 PM
Byrjun Byrjun is offline
Planar Protector

Byrjun's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravager [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
As an outsider who thinks competition in a PvE game is stupid as hell, yet a minority of the population insists that it happens, I'm wondering why a merger with anyone was a necessity? What was wrong with 3 guilds competing when competition is what those three guilds claimed to want?
FE has/had no leadership capable of competing in a class C environment. I do like a lot of FE members, but without leeching off IB or TMO leadership, they'd have to go to class R.
  #6  
Old 04-01-2014, 07:11 PM
Cyrano Cyrano is offline
The Protector of Sunder


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravager [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
As an outsider who thinks competition in a PvE game is stupid as hell, yet a minority of the population insists that it happens, I'm wondering why a merger with anyone was a necessity? What was wrong with 3 guilds competing when competition is what those three guilds claimed to want?
That's a great question. Can a former FE member explain why 3 raid guilds wasn't possible?
  #7  
Old 04-01-2014, 07:13 PM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyrano [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That's a great question. Can a former FE member explain why 3 raid guilds wasn't possible?
Any great competitor knows that they stand the greatest chance of success if they eliminate their greatest enemies, either by annihilation or by making those enemies their friends.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
  #8  
Old 04-01-2014, 07:14 PM
Cyrano Cyrano is offline
The Protector of Sunder


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Any great competitor knows that they stand the greatest chance of success if they eliminate their greatest enemies, either by annihilation or by making those enemies their friends.
Lol so now FE was full of "great competitors"?
  #9  
Old 04-01-2014, 07:16 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Any great competitor knows that they stand the greatest chance of success if they eliminate their greatest enemies, either by annihilation or by making those enemies their friends.
Civ 5 Diplomacy victory.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #10  
Old 04-01-2014, 07:13 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyrano [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That's a great question. Can a former FE member explain why 3 raid guilds wasn't possible?
It was already 2 raid guilds.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:15 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.