The Reptilian RL Iksar Thread!

[Fame]

Originally Posted by Fame [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

History channel has been a success.

[phacemeltar]

this thread is gettin good

[valarmorghulis]

The Earth, Mars, and Venus are all roughly 4.5B years old. Intelligent life could have evolved and died out on Venus and Mars long before it even started on the Earth.

Intelligent life doesn't evolve, period. It can only be created. There is no such thing as inanimate molecules "evolving" to become an intelligent life form. Life can only come from life. This is the essence of the law of biogenesis.

[Scrooge]

Originally Posted by valarmorghulis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Intelligent life doesn't evolve, period. It can only be created. There is no such thing as inanimate molecules "evolving" to become an intelligent life form. Life can only come from life. This is the essence of the law of biogenesis.

I have to agree with that statement. There was recently a docu on YT, in regards to Evolution, where an academic went to the various Universities and Colleges all over the US, to confront other academics who support Darwin's Evolution theory. However, when they were asked to provide direct proof or examples where the theory evolution can be proven, none of them were able to come up with an answer.

The theory of Evolution is just that, a theory; it looks interesting on paper, but does not have any irrefutable evidence to support itself.

[Zadrian]

Originally Posted by Scrooge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have to agree with that statement. There was recently a docu on YT, in regards to Evolution, where an academic went to the various Universities and Colleges all over the US, to confront other academics who support Darwin's Evolution theory. However, when they were asked to provide direct proof or examples where the theory evolution can be proven, none of them were able to come up with an answer.

The theory of Evolution is just that, a theory; it looks interesting on paper, but does not have any irrefutable evidence to support itself.

Learn the difference between an average theory and a scientific theory.

Secondly, the law of biogenesis does not contradict the theory of evolution - the fact that you are attempting to imply that, just shows your ignorance about the subject.

[Zadrian]

Originally Posted by valarmorghulis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Intelligent life doesn't evolve, period. It can only be created. There is no such thing as inanimate molecules "evolving" to become an intelligent life form. Life can only come from life. This is the essence of the law of biogenesis.

Except that first life. That life came from nothing, right?

[valarmorghulis]

Originally Posted by Zadrian [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Except that first life. That life came from nothing, right?

No, the first life is God. This is referring to life within the physical Universe. The first of every life form had to be created. Hence the question, which came first, the chicken or the egg? It's literally impossible that either could have come first since each requires the other to already exist in order to come into existence. This means then that the first of each life form was specifically created.

Secondly, the law of biogenesis does not contradict the theory of evolution - the fact that you are attempting to imply that, just shows your ignorance about the subject.

Actually it does because according to the law of biogenesis, all life forms can only produce after their own kind. For instance, cats come from cats and cats only produce more cats. Dogs only come from other dogs and can only produce more dogs etc,. Same goes for literally every single living thing you can think of. Horses? Come from other horses and only produce more horses. Bee's? Only come from other bee's and only produce more bee's. Birds? Only come from other birds and only produce more birds. No evidence ever observed in the history of the world has ever contradicted this established scientific fact.

Not only does the law of biogenesis and cell theory contradict evolution but so does the laws of thermodynamics. Energy is heading towards entropy. The evolution of molecules into ever increasingly complex forms is the literal opposite of what the laws of thermodynamics tell us. That energy is constantly breaking down over time and becoming less complex until ultimately all energy in existence will achieve a state of maximum entropy and will then become inert and useless.

[Zadrian]

Originally Posted by valarmorghulis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, the first life is God. This is referring to life within the physical Universe. The first of every life form had to be created. Hence the question, which came first, the chicken or the egg? It's literally impossible that either could have come first since each requires the other to already exist in order to come into existence. This means then that the first of each life form was specifically created.



Actually it does because according to the law of biogenesis, all life forms can only produce after their own kind. For instance, cats come from cats and cats only produce more cats. Dogs only come from other dogs and can only produce more dogs etc,. Same goes for literally every single living thing you can think of. Horses? Come from other horses and only produce more horses. Bee's? Only come from other bee's and only produce more bee's. Birds? Only come from other birds and only produce more birds. No evidence ever observed in the history of the world has ever contradicted this established scientific fact.

Not only does the law of biogenesis and cell theory contradict evolution but so does the laws of thermodynamics. Energy is heading towards entropy. The evolution of molecules into ever increasingly complex forms is the literal opposite of what the laws of thermodynamics tell us. That energy is constantly breaking down over time and becoming less complex until ultimately all energy in existence will achieve a state of maximum entropy and will then become inert and useless.

Show me proof of god.

You realize that the earth is an open system right?

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by Zadrian [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Show me proof of god.

You realize that the earth is an open system right?

there's no proof or disproof depending on how you engage the question. it's much the same with whether or not someone does or doesn't think (and how they concluded the notion to themselves) that there are reptilian aliens controlling the world.

[valarmorghulis]

Originally Posted by Zadrian [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Show me proof of god.

You realize that the earth is an open system right?

Proof of God is everywhere around you. Everything that exists is proof of God. Only an intelligent mind can create something and the Universe didn't always exist therefor it had a beginning and therefor has a creator. DNA itself is smoking gun evidence for God. It's an ultra complex microscopic sized molecular machine that contains the genetic information for building a living organism. Since information can only arise from an intelligent source, whoever made DNA is God.

As for the Earth being an open system. This is irrelevant because the Universe is a closed system. Also, the formation of the Earth contradicts the laws of thermodynamics as well suggesting that it was specifically built and created, further demonstrating the presence of a being capable of overcoming natural laws. Again, all things which have a beginning MUST have a creator. The Earth had a beginning, therefor it has a creator. The very sun itself had a beginning as well and that means it also had a creator. This should be the most basic of logic imaginable.