constructive criticism

[Pudge]

Originally Posted by Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pudge, this is pretty much why your post was deleted:



The white space didn't help either.

The Red Server changes thread was locked because there was nothing constructive coming from it, we are aware that a number of people in the forum community do not like this change, we knew this before implementing it, and do not need to hear more about how you do not like it.

I have already stated that we intend to look at XP on red and provide further changes to the way XP works, but the high global modifier is gone and will not be coming back, so talking more about it is pointless.

Have faith. We're not actively trying to destroy your box, pals [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

.... really? Got my post deleted because of that line of text?

Are you serious.....? You deleted my entire post.... only to REPRODUCE the "offensive" part elsewhere on the very forums you were trying to protect?

How about instead, you reproduce my entire post, but redact the heinous statement you quoted?

[Smedy]

yeah i dont agree with the xp nerf, not unless the group bonus xp gets bumped drastically

to expect the lower levels to thrive just cause everyone is gonna be stuck in the low levels isn't a good fix, its just gonna result in every lowbie quitting.

keep the slow xp but promote group xp very big, that will force people to find eachother and group rather than solo

i'm guessing this is the idea and the group xp part just didnt make it with the patch

[Kazi]

I don't understand why the emphasis appears to be on nerfs. Pet agro is broken, so let's focus on making sit agro a thing. Red's pulse can barely be measured, so let's take out one of the biggest draws but also not put in a mitigator like was mentioned. Yeah, classic EQ was basically Verant nerfbatting everything, but I don't know why that particular experience appears to be front and center on P99's agenda.

[Tradesonred]

The problem, once again, is that youre taking something from blue, and blindly applying it to red, which is a completely different animal than the blue server.

Keep saying moar you dont need our feedback

Seriously, you guys obviously do

You also posted "lolz, imagined QQ" and then a couple hours later "Major xp nerf"

Credibility took a hit there. Sure you say youre not trying to kill the box, but it sure looks like it

[Smedy]

WOOHA gyno

i'm glad you're alive pal

thin ice? yaw always, gotta keep it interesting

[Sektor]

so glad I'm 60. Tho helping players level gonna be harder.

[Gaffin 7.0]

wow this is what i wake up to, xp gone. fuck that no thx

[Juhstin]

Originally Posted by Gaffin 7.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

wow this is what i wake up to, xp gone. fuck that no thx

[Sirken]

both of you

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Tradesonred]

Its the first day since i restarted playing on the box 2-3 weeks ago that i didnt play 3hours+ because it was such a bummer to think it through. Just saying. I was in but forumquested while afk at the zone line.

So what exactly is the reasoning behind nerf that this time around nerfing xp will magically make the population go up instead of down? Is there something new to the nerf xp formula you added in we are not aware about?