Bag Limit per Guild

[Tasslehofp99]

Originally Posted by Handull [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

For once Tass is right on target

I'm always on target, usually just shooting from a different perspective!


But seriously this post is low grade RNF troll material.

Make friends, form alliances...or don't and get better.


If you compared TMO's numbers to FE/IB's numbers combined, they're almost always equal or in the same neighborhood. If we're able to team up when we're both low on numbers or work separately when we're flush with numbers, why should that be against the rules?

That just means we're taking more time to organize/plan for things, and making concessions with one another in order to make the alliance work for both parties.

Just seems to me that anyone having an issue with this is either against guilds working together, or has no one to work with them.

Not really sure where this post is coming from out of the blue anyway, kind of odd.

[mattkwi]

TMO asking to make class C restrictive. Why not just go join class R?

If a guild wants to increase its chances on FFA spawns by raiding with another why is that such a problem?

[quido]

If a crew of 60 raiders wants to split into two forces for only the simulated repops and then raid together the rest of the time, why is that such a problem? It's the same effect as what people are free to do now.

It's ok to shirk the bag limit with sometimes-one-sometimes-two forces as long as your forces existed before our new rules? How is that fair?

[Hitpoint]

Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If a crew of 60 raiders wants to split into two forces for only the simulated repops and then raid together the rest of the time, why is that such a problem? It's the same effect as what people are free to do now.

I think that should be allowed.

I wish this was a discussion in the raid chat section though. Every time I click here I'm expecting to see this turn into an rnf thread.

[quido]

Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think that should be allowed.

I wish this was a discussion in the raid chat section though. Every time I click here I'm expecting to see this turn into an rnf thread.

I think it is allowed. I also think it's stupid and that nobody really wants to see it happen. A solution such as Xasten's is a more reasonable way of handling this issue.

We were doing pretty good for a while on the no-RnF here *glares at Tasslehof*

[Hitpoint]

Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think it is allowed. I also think it's stupid and that nobody really wants to see it happen. A solution such as Xasten's is a more reasonable way of handling this issue.

I think it makes things more entertaining. I see people always want there to be low numbers engages. This gives a reason for those to exist. You don't like zerging a dragon with 60 people? Well try with 30, maybe your other 30 can kill another mob in that time and it becomes tremendously rewarding. Or maybe both groups wipe and it totally backfires. Maybe you split 3 ways and send 20 people to 3 different targets. Two of those wipe and other guilds get a chance at the mobs. Sounds fun to me, like a way of making mobs more challenging and strategic, while also giving some reward for being more skilled and organized.

[Tasslehofp99]

Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think that should be allowed.

I wish this was a discussion in the raid chat section though. Every time I click here I'm expecting to see this turn into an rnf thread.

That was the goal of the OP from the start.

[mattkwi]

If BDA/Taken want to combine forces on FFA mobs, then split on repops, and still be in their R rotation, why should that not be allowed? Just another possible example.

[quido]

If BDA and Taken were Class C and raided together 90+% of the time it wasn't a full repop, this would be bunk too.

[mattkwi]

FE/IB exist in class C. Competitive class. Their alliance is for competitive reasons.