Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-05-2014, 08:29 PM
Rec Rec is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 633
Default

A simple solution would be for anyone to stay out of anyone elses raid business
  #2  
Old 01-05-2014, 08:36 PM
Yinikren Yinikren is offline
Fire Giant

Yinikren's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 591
Default

The simple solutions were shot down because they don't award TMOFEIB enough mobs (all of them).
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by quido View Post
Look, I really want to make this better for the nonhardcores here. But if a small faction of people is going to cockblock progress because they're not getting exactly what they want.....
Abomination Snowman - 60 Grave Lord
Proud owner of Innoruuk's Curse that did NOT come from TMO's bank or RMT.
Niluvien Forestwalker - 52 Ranger
Russled Jimmies - 54 Wizard
  #3  
Old 01-05-2014, 08:42 PM
Vyal Vyal is offline
Sarnak

Vyal's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 251
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yinikren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The simple solutions were shot down because they don't award TMOFEIB enough mobs (all of them).

Doh... Those guilds are making RL bank off this server. 182 accounts banned for duping items & they are back 2 weeks later says about all you need to know for anyone who has ever dealt with brokers before.

Seems to me the mods will only unlock the raid mobs for the rest of the server whenever the TMO guild is happy and sure they can keep all the top kills.

Kinda sad but hey Sony pops emu'd server owners for selling items directly for money one huge guild knowing the exact variance spawn time on what a 4 day variance & knowing how to dupe items then coming back to raid lock the entire server - use your heads... If you know you can make thousands & thousands of dollars you don't just let it pass you by.

If that's really the truth behind the server & how it operates so be it.. There is no point for a 5 week long bitch fest on these forums when none of our opinions matter anyways and won't unless you agree with TMO.
Last edited by Vyal; 01-05-2014 at 08:48 PM..
  #4  
Old 01-05-2014, 08:46 PM
radditsu radditsu is offline
Planar Protector

radditsu's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vyal [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Doh... Those guilds are making RL bank off this server. 182 accounts banned for duping items & they are back 2 weeks later says about all you need to know for anyone who has ever dealt with brokers before.

Seems to me the mods will only unlock the raid mobs for the rest of the server whenever the TMO guild is happy and sure they can keep all the top kills.

Kinda sad but hey Sony pops emu'd server owners for selling items directly for money one huge guild knowing the exact variance spawn time on what a 4 day variance & knowing how to dupe items then coming back to raid lock the entire server - use your heads... If you know you can make thousands & thousands of dollars don't just let it pass you by.
Lol did not read raid forum. It is ok. Reading is hard.
__________________

Tanrin,Rinat,Sprucewaynee
  #5  
Old 01-05-2014, 08:41 PM
element08 element08 is offline
Aviak

element08's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: tane.us
Posts: 84
Default

nobody seems to bring up the option of spawning raid targets more often. Bump it up 50% and almost any proposel becomes acceptable to accomodate different play styles and still leave enough targets around for both hardcore and casual.
__________________
  #6  
Old 01-05-2014, 08:54 PM
kotton05 kotton05 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,732
Default

going from dam near no mobs to a good bit of mobs yet still complaining not fair... smh, while I raid led full circle i'd blow my load over free merbs.
  #7  
Old 01-05-2014, 08:59 PM
Uteunayr Uteunayr is offline
Fire Giant

Uteunayr's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 780
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kotton05 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
going from dam near no mobs to a good bit of mobs yet still complaining not fair... smh, while I raid led full circle i'd blow my load over free merbs.
Because it's not about free mobs, it's about being able to play the game in a way you all don't want to. Since you all don't want to change (which is fair), we want to have a share of mobs to play the game in our way.

"I just don't see how any guild, GM or guide can dictate any guild to adapt to a play style they don't want to. Focus on that, figure how the two different sides can adapt it to this problem. Limiting NPCs to one tier or another and forced into the other side's play style is the second biggest issue."

Forcing others to play your version of classic is what has brought about so many conflicts. If these players forced you to play their casual style, conflicts would happen. It is why Rogean's plan provides for separate means for each side to play their own way, without being a detriment on the other.

Further, if you want to mock people saying something isn't fair, define it, and back up why your definition fits. By many definitions in political philosophy of what fairness is, the current distribution is anything but fair, and even Rogean's plan is unfair to the casuals, but it is a level of unfairness that is more fair than the current system. The desire to be left alone from a different raiding style is so extreme, I am sure most are behind giving even more mobs to you all just to let them manage their own business without needing to play the game your way. Let each do their own style in peace from one another.
  #8  
Old 01-05-2014, 09:04 PM
radditsu radditsu is offline
Planar Protector

radditsu's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uteunayr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Because it's not about free mobs, it's about being able to play the game in a way you all don't want to. Since you all don't want to change (which is fair), we want to have a share of mobs to play the game in our way.

"I just don't see how any guild, GM or guide can dictate any guild to adapt to a play style they don't want to. Focus on that, figure how the two different sides can adapt it to this problem. Limiting NPCs to one tier or another and forced into the other side's play style is the second biggest issue."

Forcing others to play your version of classic is what has brought about so many conflicts. If these players forced you to play their casual style, conflicts would happen. It is why Rogean's plan provides for separate means for each side to play their own way, without being a detriment on the other.

Further, if you want to mock people saying something isn't fair, define it, and back up why your definition fits. By some of the strongest definitions used today in political science, the current distribution is anything but fair, and even Rogean's plan is unfair to the casuals, but it is a level of unfairness that is more fair than the current system. Let each do their own style in peace from one another.


Yeah, you have no idea how this works, do you? You can tone it down about 10000%. Nobody wants to read dissertations on musings on thoughts on top of erudite quandrys on top of written motormouth.

In forum speak... SOOOOOMANY TLDR LAWL
__________________

Tanrin,Rinat,Sprucewaynee
  #9  
Old 01-05-2014, 09:01 PM
Yinikren Yinikren is offline
Fire Giant

Yinikren's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 591
Default

Very eloquently put, Utuenayr.

Its not about the mobs - about about playing how we want to play. All these proposals have been shot down because you can't compete with us -only TMO - and you don't want that.

This is why the top 4 mobs are in contention - because we don't want to compete the same way you do and that, by default, means "we don't deserve those mobs" to you.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by quido View Post
Look, I really want to make this better for the nonhardcores here. But if a small faction of people is going to cockblock progress because they're not getting exactly what they want.....
Abomination Snowman - 60 Grave Lord
Proud owner of Innoruuk's Curse that did NOT come from TMO's bank or RMT.
Niluvien Forestwalker - 52 Ranger
Russled Jimmies - 54 Wizard
Last edited by Yinikren; 01-05-2014 at 09:04 PM..
  #10  
Old 01-03-2014, 02:42 AM
Mezzmur Mezzmur is offline
Fire Giant

Mezzmur's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatos [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
May we remove characters that were parked in those zones before this hit?
Petition or Ask a GM, I asked for my monk to be moved out of VP earlier today.
__________________
Bamek Blazingbeard
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:51 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.