Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-30-2013, 11:32 PM
Lazie Lazie is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrKvothe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Design a system where FE/IB and TMO get 25% or less (not 67% or more) of all non-VP targets and it might get some attention. There's absolutely no reason after 2 years of domination FE/IB should get VP and any more non-VP raid targets than anyone else. Cap all guilds at 1 kill of each target per month. Hell, it's better than this shit proposal.
Oh wow.. You guys are actually lumping TMO and FE-IB together now as far as kills per month as if FE-IB benefited from all those TMO kills. What alternate reality is this ?
  #2  
Old 12-30-2013, 11:33 PM
Hailto Hailto is offline
Planar Protector

Hailto's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Oh wow.. You guys are actually lumping TMO and FE-IB together now as far as kills per month as if FE-IB benefited from all those TMO kills. What alternate reality is this ?
Reality of a 54 shaman main.
__________________
Blue:
[60 Oracle] Kaludar (Barbarian)
[35 Enchanter] Droxzn (Skeleton)
[XX Rogue] Hailto (Half-Elf)
Red:
[21 Wizard] Hailto (Dark-Elf)
  #3  
Old 12-30-2013, 11:36 PM
Xadion Xadion is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrKvothe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Design a system where FE/IB and TMO get 25% or less (not 67% or more) of all non-VP targets and it might get some attention. There's absolutely no reason after 2 years of domination FE/IB and TMO should get VP and any more non-VP raid targets than anyone else. Cap all guilds at 1 kill of each target per month. Hell, it's better than this shit proposal.
please someone tell me this dude is trolling and got lost on his way to RnF

and IB + FE should be 1 guild.

carry on
__________________
-----------------------------------------
OG Moustache, respect...

Xadion Von'Darkborn - Shadow Knight
Cory Von'Darkborn - Ranger
Brezner Von'Darkborn - Bard
Watermelons Siliconmelons - Corpse/Shaman


  #4  
Old 12-30-2013, 11:22 PM
JayN JayN is offline
Fire Giant

JayN's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 889
Default

"Either the good players will shed the cheaters or the cheaters will risk another Froovy/Internode situation and cause not 1, but 2 guilds to be banned."

or a couple of scheming asshole could screw a whole lot of people; even worse next time!
  #5  
Old 12-30-2013, 11:25 PM
Yinikren Yinikren is offline
Fire Giant

Yinikren's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 591
Default

I'm butthurt, someone called me a faggot. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But seriously, a proposal like mine, on top of being easily policed and enforced, would open up raiding for at least 4-5 guilds on the server. Which is, y'know, what the CSR team wanted.

I'll come right out and say that you elite raiders don't like my idea because you're losing more mobs than you think you should. I don't expect you to like it. I'm not making the system to help you kill more shit.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by quido View Post
Look, I really want to make this better for the nonhardcores here. But if a small faction of people is going to cockblock progress because they're not getting exactly what they want.....
Abomination Snowman - 60 Grave Lord
Proud owner of Innoruuk's Curse that did NOT come from TMO's bank or RMT.
Niluvien Forestwalker - 52 Ranger
Russled Jimmies - 54 Wizard
  #6  
Old 12-30-2013, 11:27 PM
Hailto Hailto is offline
Planar Protector

Hailto's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,501
Default

It's a good thing your opinion means fuck all in the grand scheme of things isn't it Yinikren?
__________________
Blue:
[60 Oracle] Kaludar (Barbarian)
[35 Enchanter] Droxzn (Skeleton)
[XX Rogue] Hailto (Half-Elf)
Red:
[21 Wizard] Hailto (Dark-Elf)
  #7  
Old 12-30-2013, 11:34 PM
Yinikren Yinikren is offline
Fire Giant

Yinikren's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 591
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hailto [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's a good thing your opinion means fuck all in the grand scheme of things isn't it Yinikren?
You're right, that's why my system has the biggest following of people who could make it work while we are here shitting up this proposal for being a sad idea.

Who the fuck are you again?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by quido View Post
Look, I really want to make this better for the nonhardcores here. But if a small faction of people is going to cockblock progress because they're not getting exactly what they want.....
Abomination Snowman - 60 Grave Lord
Proud owner of Innoruuk's Curse that did NOT come from TMO's bank or RMT.
Niluvien Forestwalker - 52 Ranger
Russled Jimmies - 54 Wizard
  #8  
Old 12-30-2013, 11:34 PM
Hailto Hailto is offline
Planar Protector

Hailto's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yinikren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Who the fuck are you again?
Please tell me about your e-status.
__________________
Blue:
[60 Oracle] Kaludar (Barbarian)
[35 Enchanter] Droxzn (Skeleton)
[XX Rogue] Hailto (Half-Elf)
Red:
[21 Wizard] Hailto (Dark-Elf)
  #9  
Old 12-30-2013, 11:37 PM
Hitpoint Hitpoint is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yinikren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You're right, that's why my system has the biggest following of people who could make it work while we are here shitting up this proposal for being a sad idea.

Who the fuck are you again?
I don't have time to read your entire thread. But you're basically proposing that AG and TMO both have 100 points right? Are you flexible on this? Somewhere in this giant thread do you say that it's actually fair for TMO to have more like..400? That would lead me to believe your proposal could actually make sense.
Last edited by Hitpoint; 12-30-2013 at 11:39 PM..
  #10  
Old 12-30-2013, 11:46 PM
Scoresby Scoresby is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 85
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don't have time to read your entire thread. But you're basically proposing that AG and TMO both have 100 points right? Are you flexible on this? Somewhere in this giant thread do you say that it's actually fair for TMO to have more like..400? That would lead me to believe your proposal could actually make sense.
Are you being dense on purpose? Every guild gets the same amount of points, but not every guild will get kills to use up their points. It merely forces guilds to focus on targets that matter to them. You still would have to out compete everyone for the raid target, just can't exceed your point limit by killing any and everything. It's pretty damned simple.

The reward you get for being top tier is the best items, but the concession is the raid scene opens to a significantly larger playerbase....which was a requirement of the agreement to begin with.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:58 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.