So alarti and eccezan

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by kbnexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I like how these rulings are always unilateral.

You may want to check the definition of "unilateral".

Originally Posted by Rogean

We had a CSR Staff meeting last night to decide how to proceed, and we agreed on the following.

Sounds pretty non-unilateral to me. Unless you were hoping they'd come consult the TMO leadership on how to proceed with this situation.

[kbnexus]

Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You may want to check the definition of "unilateral".



Sounds pretty non-unilateral to me. Unless you were hoping they'd come consult the TMO leadership on how to proceed with this situation.

Well they consult the other Guilds when they have adverse rulings against them. See the 2 hour skype call with Unbrella, Sloan, Shinko last week before IB/FE's raid band.


Also this is a rogean decision, not a group decision.

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by kbnexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well they consult the other Guilds when they have adverse rulings against them. See the 2 hour skype call with Unbrella, Sloan, Shinko last week before IB/FE's raid band.


Also this is a rogean decision, not a group decision.

So you say you were not consulted and then you make a statement that indicates you have more information about who made the decision than the rest of us. You may want to try limiting your self contradictions to multiple posts. Putting them in a single post just makes this too easy.

[kotton05]

Originally Posted by kbnexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well they consult the other Guilds when they have adverse rulings against them. See the 2 hour skype call with Unbrella, Sloan, Shinko last week before IB/FE's raid band.


Also this is a rogean decision, not a group decision.

See your all day skype call to fuck us on ct

[kbnexus]

Originally Posted by Bodeanicus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well, you're fucking stupid enough to allow known scumbags to play your character, what do you expect? Don't act like they didn't know what was going on.

All 10 of my accounts are clean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]. Also, they weren't known scumbags. I think if people in RNF were being honest they would admit that froovy was very well liked across the entire server. I have never heard of a single person upset with froovy.

[radditsu]

Originally Posted by kbnexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

All 10 of my accounts are clean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]. Also, they weren't known scumbags. I think if people in RNF were being honest they would admit that froovy was very well liked across the entire server. I have never heard of a single person upset with froovy.

Ill go as far as, outside of raiding, I have never had an issue with anyone in TMO ever. Your obvious obfuscation and outright lying on the irks me on the forums. But as far as outside of raiding in TMO, not one issue.

It's like a flip switches and you get frothing at the mouth when that batphone goes out.

[radditsu]

All non TMO prob Gaffin alts.

[Gaffin 3.0]

Originally Posted by radditsu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

All non TMO prob Gaffin alts.

chortled

[Yinikren]

I like how TMO is specifically pointed out as a problem for raid monopolization for 2 years on content they don't need, and now they play nice or GTFO.

Good times ahead, let other people have fun.

[Acrux Bcrux]

GOOD. Fuck TMO. Yall finally got what yall deserved. Bend over and take it.