Victim disarmament zones

[r00t]

its not your money so no wonder you dont give a fuck

[r00t]

supreme court ruled 2nd amendment gives me personal right to own beautiful steel

[aowen]

Originally Posted by r00t [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

supreme court ruled 2nd amendment gives me personal right to own beautiful steel

Indeed

[aowen]

I guess I shouldn't expect much from a person who thinks personal anecdotes are more important evidence with no credibility or way to be validated than statistics methodically collected by professionals working for organizations with reputations to uphold.

[JayN]

Originally Posted by aowen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I guess I shouldn't expect much from a person who thinks personal anecdotes are more important evidence with no credibility or way to be validated than statistics methodically collected by professionals working for organizations with reputations to uphold.

if onlyz u waz smat and new dat ******s r ******s wth man

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by aowen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I guess I shouldn't expect much from a person who thinks personal anecdotes are more important evidence with no credibility or way to be validated than statistics methodically collected by professionals working for organizations with reputations to uphold.

Mind quoting the post where I said personal anecdotes are more important than data? You are being intellectually lazy again, conflating my position with other people you were arguing with in that other thread.

[aowen]

Meh, the only person who shares any information or has clearly read into an issue is the one who is told to go do more learning.

Most of the people on here sound like their idea of data collection is listening to Limbaugh and O'Reilly scream for an hour

[aowen]

Oh yes, that was mr. Vaildez. Either way, you still neglected to provide any data to support your claims in that argument, and you've done the same in this one. You're angle seems primarily in developing an ideology, which should only be done after a substantial amount of facts have been done.

[JayN]

Originally Posted by aowen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh yes, that was mr. Vaildez. Either way, you still neglected to provide any data to support your claims in that argument, and you've done the same in this one. You're angle seems primarily in developing an ideology, which should only be done after a substantial amount of facts have been done.

You obviously hate freedom, america and babies. You are aiding terrorists, you will be brought to justice!

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by aowen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh yes, that was mr. Vaildez. Either way, you still neglected to provide any data to support your claims in that argument, and you've done the same in this one. You're angle seems primarily in developing an ideology, which should only be done after a substantial amount of facts have been done.

It's ok, I accept your apology.

What data should I be showing? The points I have made don't necessarily have data to show. Such as the fact that the soviets and chinese had/have strict gun laws. Should I come up with a bar graph that shows the number of gun laws in each case? The fact that you cannot fathom an argument based upon logic and reason is very telling. It's clear you bow down at the altar of muddled statistics. Statistics can ever only show correlation, which can help guide us in our search for truth, but cannot directly show us truth.