Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-01-2013, 11:02 AM
Vandy Vandy is offline
Sarnak

Vandy's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 283
Default

I like this a lot, I currently play blue and yes it's getting stale. I would give this server a shot.
  #2  
Old 09-01-2013, 11:57 AM
liveitup1216 liveitup1216 is offline
Fire Giant

liveitup1216's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 607
Default

I'll dust off my p99 folder for a SZ server.
  #3  
Old 09-01-2013, 01:18 PM
Fawqueue Fawqueue is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 443
Default

Thorough read, and I like a lot of your ideas. I'm torn though on a lot of the alterations. On one hand, it would alleviate a potential repeat of the lop-sided teams on live. On the other hand, we're not just talking about people from the project who have tried Red and decided against it. A brand new classic server with a SZ rule set will be attractive to a lot of people who've never played here. And some of those potential new players might be turned off to find that all these unexpected alterations to a classic formula they thought they were getting.

I do think the SZ rule set is the way to go. We have FFA now and it's not working. Racial teams is enjoyable from the standpoint that everyone you start with is a buddy, but it's even more troubled with missing class/race comps.

I'm not suggesting not to make any of these changes, some of them are good (the only one I'm really against is the massive stats/resists bonus because even though it would help...it just feels too 'not real EQ' to me). I'm going to put my faith in the devs and the community to make this thing work. Retaining players is important, but I started years ago when our population was no better than Red. The quality of the product kept people coming in and staying, so if we do the same thing here we won't need quadruple xp and other weird "that's why I don't play emulators" kinda stuff.
  #4  
Old 09-01-2013, 01:19 PM
heartbrand heartbrand is offline
Planar Protector

heartbrand's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The Wire
Posts: 9,758
Default

Here's the problem with the FFA doesn't work argument, it's like opening up a shoe store that has no shoes / says fuck you to the customers and refuses to stock shoes for 2 years, then shuts down and opens up a suit store saying "well people just don't want shoes."
  #5  
Old 09-01-2013, 01:21 PM
Bazia Bazia is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,152
Default

no ruleset will work, once big dog is established people will quit

its not specific to FFA, your basically just fucking over the people invest in the current red
  #6  
Old 09-01-2013, 02:46 PM
runlvlzero runlvlzero is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In a motherfucking awesome place.
Posts: 2,801
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bazia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
no ruleset will work, once big dog is established people will quit

its not specific to FFA, your basically just fucking over the people invest in the current red
You sound like a pussy. What guild are you in? Join the motherfucking underdog team and be a pro. SZ worked great like that.
  #7  
Old 09-01-2013, 01:40 PM
Vexenu Vexenu is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,221
Default

Literally the only thing confirmed at this point is that the new server will be teams, so continuing to talk about FFA is a waste of time. The server must include teams to attract enough players to keep it from turning into Red 2.0.

Also, under my proposed ruleset, the Evil team WILL BE TOTALLY FFA. If you want the freedom to attack anyone, it's very simple: roll Evil. If you think Nihilum will roll Evil, that means they'll have to deal with not only the Good and Neutral team coming after them, but potentially their own team as well. With serverwide advance shouts + small variance, they would also be forced to PvP for every spawn. If they can dominate the server by overcoming all that, then my hat will be off to them, because they would clearly have earned it.

And all this talk about exploiting teams to grief people is complete nonsense. Same-team training is illegal and should result in a suspension/ban if repeated. Running around with 6 wizards to KS people on your team doesn't even need to be illegal, because no one's going to do it. That's pure forum bullshitting. Plus, most of the people who want to grief will be rolling evil team for FFA anyway, so they would have no protection from hardcoded teams.
  #8  
Old 09-01-2013, 02:48 PM
Bazia Bazia is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,152
Default

yeah because on red everyone joined the underdogs

wait no they didnt they either joined nihilum or quit

well at least 90%
  #9  
Old 09-02-2013, 08:15 AM
Old_PVP Old_PVP is offline
Sarnak

Old_PVP's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Insanity's Edge
Posts: 472
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bazia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
yeah because on red everyone joined the underdogs

wait no they didnt they either joined nihilum or quit

well at least 90%
Quote:
no ruleset will work, once big dog is established people will quit

its not specific to FFA, your basically just fucking over the people invest in the current red
True pvpers WANT the underdog team. They want the challenge, they truly are the 1%. Many of the older pvpers have been moving from game to game, searching for that long lost spark of PVP. Trying to find a fix, waiting for that perfect ruleset to come along. They don't care about shiny loot or ever seeing end game bosses.

All they want is to "crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of the women."

The real reason for underdog failure, in any game, is never a lack of spirit and willingness to fight. Core mechanics are to blame, such as in red99. If you have a FFA pvp environment, item loot MUST exist, in order for the dynamic of the server to be balanced. Item loot must be present for various different reasons on FFA. Without it, the underdogs of the server have little chance of inflicting noticeable damage to the top guilds.

This is all a moot point anyways since the new server will be TEAMS, and a team style ruleset does not need item loot to succeed.

-Underdog for life
  #10  
Old 09-01-2013, 02:53 PM
runlvlzero runlvlzero is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In a motherfucking awesome place.
Posts: 2,801
Default

Dood your argument is a straw man. You cannot predict the future of a server to that degree of accuracy. Everyone NOT in Nihilum was banned early on and the server had like a year to just rot in classic, then Nihilum had kunark on lockdown.

SZ was different. Totally different dynamics and evil dominated for entirely different reasons. And there was a ton more PvP and the underdogs did kill a lot of evils. Unlike here where they just infight constantly and let Nihilum run rampant.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:09 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.