Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-28-2013, 09:22 PM
Bazia Bazia is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stasis01 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Stale EQ is bunk as shit, fresh servers is where it's at.
yeah farming fungi #374123 for alts that never get played is tight, I vote 2 more years of that
  #2  
Old 07-28-2013, 11:30 PM
Clark Clark is offline
Planar Protector

Clark's Avatar

Join Date: May 2012
Location: Metropolis
Posts: 5,147
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stasis01 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Stale EQ is bunk as shit, fresh servers is where it's at.

Sirken trollen us hard probably - but I've got a partial.
absolutely
  #3  
Old 07-28-2013, 09:18 PM
Lurgort/Sseri Lurgort/Sseri is offline
Fire Giant

Lurgort/Sseri's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Alaska
Posts: 796
Default

After reading through this rapidly growing thread, I'll agree with the folks who say 3 teams. Splitting everyone among three separate factions is a good way to go about things.

Look at PlanetSide - they have a pretty nicely set up 3-team system. I'm sure the folks in charge here can create something I and everyone else on the server would be glad to log in when we get that hankering for classic EQ and PVP.

It'll most certainly attract new players because FFA PVP servers are intimidating, and therefore new players avoid it.
__________________
Retired P99 player

P99B Strazha (60 Warlock) [Iksar]
P99B Sstrix (60 Warlord) [Iksar]
P99B Sickjams (5 Bard) [EC Mule]
P99G Sauna (51 Channeler) [Gnome]
P99R Sseri (54 Mystic) [Iksar]
VZ/TZ '08-'09 Lurgort (60 Shaman) [Barbarian] <Eight Inches Unbuffed>
  #4  
Old 07-28-2013, 09:27 PM
Robdukes Robdukes is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 80
Default

3 teams seems best. This way if one team got too large and started monopolizing content the other two could take it down right before turning on each other. Instead of just 2 teams trying to zerg each other they can also be making shaky alliances with the 3rd team, adding a whole other dimension to the battle.
  #5  
Old 02-12-2014, 05:04 AM
Clark Clark is offline
Planar Protector

Clark's Avatar

Join Date: May 2012
Location: Metropolis
Posts: 5,147
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robdukes [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
3 teams seems best. This way if one team got too large and started monopolizing content the other two could take it down right before turning on each other. Instead of just 2 teams trying to zerg each other they can also be making shaky alliances with the 3rd team, adding a whole other dimension to the battle.
  #6  
Old 07-28-2013, 11:29 PM
Clark Clark is offline
Planar Protector

Clark's Avatar

Join Date: May 2012
Location: Metropolis
Posts: 5,147
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lurgort/Sseri [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
After reading through this rapidly growing thread, I'll agree with the folks who say 3 teams. Splitting everyone among three separate factions is a good way to go about things.

Look at PlanetSide - they have a pretty nicely set up 3-team system. I'm sure the folks in charge here can create something I and everyone else on the server would be glad to log in when we get that hankering for classic EQ and PVP.

It'll most certainly attract new players because FFA PVP servers are intimidating, and therefore new players avoid it.
  #7  
Old 07-28-2013, 11:40 PM
runlvlzero runlvlzero is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In a motherfucking awesome place.
Posts: 2,801
Default

Yes I have also been converted to this line of thought, however you slice them 3 is good.
  #8  
Old 07-28-2013, 09:19 PM
SamwiseRed SamwiseRed is offline
Planar Protector

SamwiseRed's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tatooine
Posts: 10,188
Default

aika is this terrible terrible asian mmo i used to play. the only reason i played was because the mass pvp was fucking huge. alot of 100v100v50 fights (5 teams but each team could have 1 ally, the strongest team was not allowed to ally so it was always 2v2v1 teams wise) it was always balanced and fun. the only reason SZ failed was because of the player base. i think this time around shit will be different. if not well fuck it. i guarantee you if 3 teams fails so will 2 teams.

the past 2 years has pretty much been a 2 team server. you have your nillys and your not nillys. sometimes there would be a 2nd or 3rd contender but never for more than a month.

the MAIN problem i see is that with red99, people can make unlimited accounts. on live your account was flagged to the first char you made. if you made an evil char you could only roll evil alts (unless you deleted all your toons) I guess there is no way we can enforce perma team selection but it would be nice.
__________________
Current Games:
Naw
Last edited by SamwiseRed; 07-28-2013 at 09:21 PM..
  #9  
Old 07-28-2013, 09:20 PM
Bazia Bazia is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,152
Default

Sam what team we rolling bro
  #10  
Old 07-28-2013, 09:20 PM
liveitup1216 liveitup1216 is offline
Fire Giant

liveitup1216's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 607
Default

FFA servers aren't intimidating, they're dumb. At least when people want to xteam and jump ship with hardcoded teams, they gotta reroll.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.