Teams - whats better?

[Faerie]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We have people abusing the no level restriction out of group dispel, and throw away accounts to train raids... and you think teams won't be abused

In what ways would they be abused? How large of an impact would team exploits have on the game?

Originally Posted by Rushmore [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What would be in place to prevent spys? you can't stop this.

What's in place to stop spies now? I've been trained for being a suspected oor spy here, so I assume you'd just keep training each other like you do now.

Originally Posted by Tradesonred [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So what happened, seriously?

Did Sirken just create this thread and never posted back after 62 pages?

Is that why theres only 95 people online

Like YEAH, THIS IS EXCITING, WE MIGHT BE GETTING A WIPE!!

No wipe, no followup as to why this thread was created while red down for 2 days, 95 people online.

No one representing the server mentioned a wipe, what are you talking about? This is about teams.

Once Sleeper script ends, server will go down. Once it's back up, all guilds will have been deleted and we'll be in our hardcoded teams [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Tradesonred]

Originally Posted by Faerie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No one representing the server mentioned a wipe, what are you talking about? This is about teams.

What i meant is out of the blue, while servers been down for 2 days, Sirken asks people to debate the pros and cons of a teams server vs FFA.

Which fueled speculation

You might think somebody would have stepped in and said: whoa whoa whoa, nothings getting rebooted, we arent gonna wipe the server and make it a teams server now, i am just bored since server is down and am interested in what people think is the best potential server setup?

It was written on the front page that red data was safe, but still...

[Arclyte]

2 teams would be shit, probably worse than ffa

3+ teams required

[big league chew]

only teams situation i approve of is me vs all

[Stasis01]

I dont wanna get banned

[Turp_SmokinPurp]

3 teams would be cool. Lights vs Darks and than your Neutrals. One thing that sucked on live was X teaming though, if there was a way to implement lights not being able to heal darks and vice versa it would work great, and Neutrals can go either way anytime so they are open to be hit by both sides. So it would make the invulnerable healer not possible , right?
Is there a way to do that easily?

[SamwiseRed]

Originally Posted by Turp_SmokinPurp [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

3 teams would be cool. Lights vs Darks and than your Neutrals. One thing that sucked on live was X teaming though, if there was a way to implement lights not being able to heal darks and vice versa it would work great, and Neutrals can go either way anytime so they are open to be hit by both sides. So it would make the invulnerable healer not possible , right?
Is there a way to do that easily?

lol wut?

[Turp_SmokinPurp]

3 team.
Lights vs Darks and than your Neutrals.

One thing that sucked on live was X teaming though, if there was a way to implement lights not being able to heal darks and vice versa it would work great! and Neutrals can go either way anytime so they are open to be hit by both sides.
So it would make the invulnerable healer not possible.

Originally Posted by SamwiseRed [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

lol wut?

Trying to think of a way to get that classic fun team PvP without the pain of X team
( if your not sure on x team? If that was your lol wut question?? heres an example. Its when a light healer heals his dark friend why the dark friend beats on you and your also a lightie and you cannot kill his healer because he is ally therefore you are screwed.)
Somehow removing this or causing the "immortal" healer to be flagged pvp or something would make the 3 team idea great and bring a whole slew of new players to your server.
No Xteam if want more than 50players, if not. Enjoy )

[SamwiseRed]

Originally Posted by Turp_SmokinPurp [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

3 team.
Lights vs Darks and than your Neutrals.

One thing that sucked on live was X teaming though, if there was a way to implement lights not being able to heal darks and vice versa it would work great! and Neutrals can go either way anytime so they are open to be hit by both sides.
So it would make the invulnerable healer not possible.



Trying to think of a way to get that classic fun team PvP without the pain of X team
( if your not sure on x team? If that was your lol wut question?? heres an example. Its when a light healer heals his dark friend why the dark friend beats on you and your also a lightie and you cannot kill his healer because he is ally therefore you are screwed.)
Somehow removing this or causing the "immortal" healer to be flagged pvp or something would make the 3 team idea great and bring a whole slew of new players to your server.
No Xteam if want more than 50players, if not. Enjoy )

Don't remember x teaming on sullon zek. I never heard of heals landing on other teams.

[Tubzy]

2 teams horrible idea 99% of the time in MMOs because it ensures one team ultimately will become dominant and then everyone will just switch to that team. In a 100 pop server there's the dilemma that 3 teams is just too much spread for such a low pop but 2 teams you will see a team become dominant much faster, maybe almost instantly like within 1-2 weeks. Therefore I would say FFA is the only way to go unless this server somehow gets to 500+ active population.

tl;dr: I love 3 team PVP like DAOC but this servers too small to have teams.