PSA: ATTN - If you are bound in raid zones, read this

[hagard]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As to Hagard, there's a huge difference between exploiting pathing or money dupes or something that doesn't have a rule written about it but is clearly wrong, with something like this, retaining your bind post change following a vigorous two month debate during which not once was it suggested retroactive bind removal should be applied.

how is it not clearly wrong if you are the only one capable of binding there? IE people arent able to bind there now???

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by hagard [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

how is it not clearly wrong if you are the only one capable of binding there? IE people arent able to bind there now???

So is being bound @ the TD pots against the rules?

[Nirgon]

You know what else it doesn't say in writing in the rules? Don't be a dumb ass.

So how can you be a dumb ass acting like a dumb ass if there's nothing saying don't act like a dumb ass.

[Nirgon]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think Heartbrand could bring a lot to Dumass and Dumass.

[SamwiseRed]

was gonna put my 2 copper but sirken pretty much forumbombed nizzarr and hb through 3 tables from the top rope.

[p-niner]

Sirken snapping slim jims and cold stone stunning scrubs

[RenianVZ]

Originally Posted by p-niner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sirken snapping slim jims and cold stone stunning scrubs

gotta love those cold stone stunners

[heartbrand]

I'll try to spell it out for you one last time. We have custom rules here, one of which is the deeming of certain zones to be "FFA". This was applied to Sol B and Permafrost but not to KC. What I'm saying is that if you're going to apply this rule to Sol B and Permafrost, under the fear of bind rushing and raid disruption, then it should apply to KC as well where said bind rushing and raid disruption has actually occurred regularly, unlike Sol B and Permafrost where even prior to the implementation of the bind removal it was a low occurrence issue.

[heartbrand]

Just because Sirken has a green name on the forums doesn't mean that his logic is somehow superior to others just because he gets to decide who lives or dies here. Plenty of people get to do the same thing in tons of oppressive countries and it doesn't make their decisions any more sensible. The only reason I even posted in this thread wasn't because I truly care what happens in the future with binding in "raid zones", it really is a non-issue to be honest, but because people were saying we have been "exploiting" it here when all post history on the subject suggests strongly the opposite.

[Sirken]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just because Sirken has a green name on the forums doesn't mean that his logic is somehow superior to others

you're right! luckily having a green name means that it doesnt have to be.

cause watch this;

If i catch you bound in Perma, you're getting banned. your participation in this thread informs me that you are aware of the rule change, and as a responsible officer of your guild, i'm holding you accountable for their actions should they refuse to change their bind spots.

have a great day!



Edit - Timorous Deep is fine, they were allowed to keep those.