Quote:
Originally Posted by Kagatob
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
My knowledge of Dionysus is limited so I can neither confirm or deny it however the story of Jesus is based off of Gilgamesh through and through whom predates Dionysus as well so both Myths are likely based off of the Legend of Gilgamesh.
Having read both the Torah and the New Testament on two separate occasions I'd like to request you clarify this statement. Are you trying to imply that the books don't promote violence/slavery/etc.? Or are you saying that they do regardless of interpretation because it's just plainly there. We agree if you meant the latter.
Really? If you are going to go on about primary sources at least spell Quran correctly.
|
Re. Koran, seriously? It's the English rendering, as you well know. Cheap tactics man.
On the other points - and as I'm sure you are aware also - they have been addressed and answered thousands of times on the internet. If you're seriously looking for truth and not just an argument, you'd already know this. The Old Testament was law, the New Testament is the answer to it, and fulfillment of it. I'm not denying this is a big discussion, but firing cheap shots across the bow doesn't win your side any points (except perhaps on Reddit and forums such as this).
But meh... no-one is going to be convinced of anything on a forum where people come to argue. My point was the OP's question telegraphs a fundamental non-understanding of what the gospel is as outlined in the New Testament. We aren't saved by our own actions or inactions; we are saved by what Jesus did for us and our faith in him (within the context of the Bible, it's irrelevant what anyone things about that in regards to the truth of it - this is the message of the Bible, so when you talk about Christianity as the OP has, then this is the context within which the discussion is being held).
That's my only point.