|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should cure disease remove plague after 2-3 casts? | |||
| Yes |
   
|
15 | 35.71% |
| No |
  
|
27 | 64.29% |
| Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
11-14-2011, 08:39 PM
|
|||
|
Cure Disease should remove plague
since we are going the balance route and not the classic route, I believe cure disease should remove plague after 2 or 3 casts (depending on either chance or whatever you think) rather then the current 9 casts
while paladins usually stand a fair chance vs any class, as it stands us noble paladins are gonna get our shit pushed in by semi competent shamans bc we can do nothing when we are plagued. casting insidious malady and then plague makes it so you would have to cure disease (the only disease cure available to paladins until lvl 55~) 18 times to get rid of plague shamans are already mega powerful and im sure this change wouldnt make shamans suck or anything, just give us noble pallys a chance Asystole the necro dot might be having the same problem, though i have not confirmed
__________________
Griefer of Greenie, 1999-2003
PvP Champ, 2003-2005 Senior Vice President, <PvP Champs> 2006-Present | ||
|
Last edited by gloinz; 11-14-2011 at 08:55 PM..
|
|
||
|
#2
11-14-2011, 08:41 PM
|
|||
|
Considering Plague is lower damage, higher mana cost, this is like the best thing about the spell is it tougher to get rid of. I am gonna have to say no on this one personally.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
11-14-2011, 08:48 PM
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Griefer of Greenie, 1999-2003
PvP Champ, 2003-2005 Senior Vice President, <PvP Champs> 2006-Present | |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
11-14-2011, 08:51 PM
|
||||
|
cure is viable in pvp
__________________
Quote:
Wipe it clean. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
11-14-2011, 09:01 PM
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Linear Mode
