US Oligarchs Find Common Ground In Circumventing Law

[maskedmelon]

Just today residents of SCOTUS bridged ideologic divides in unanimously refusing to rule on the questions of religious liberty and the right to healthcare: is religious zealotry justified in discrimination of harlotry?

Returning the case to lower courts, Justices directed their Padawns to take another look as there might be another way according to indications by the program's namesake, POTUS Barrack Hussein Obama.

Source

[Pokesan]

religious liberty in this instance means punishing women for having sex

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

religious liberty in this instance means punishing women for having sex

Nature already does this. It's called pregnancy. Looks like women are getting the shaft either way =/

[Blitzers]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nature already does this. It's called pregnancy. Looks like women are getting the shaft either way =/

Oh the plight of the female species, since we as a culture have killed God can we please kill nature now too?

[maerilith]

Originally Posted by Blitzers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh the plight of the female species, since we as a culture have killed God can we please kill nature now too?

[x] killed nature
[x] totally redefined nature
[x] totally loves nature

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nature already does this. It's called pregnancy. Looks like women are getting the shaft either way =/

should man be just as cruel as nature?

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

should man be just as cruel as nature?

Nature can't hold a candle to man's limitless cruelty nor his insanity.
...or that of governments.

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

should man be just as cruel as nature?

It is man's sacred duty to best nature. What nature does well, man must do better. What nature does poorly, man must do worse. Only by outperforming nature at every turn can man know progress.

Nature is lazy, adopting strategies that are good enough. Its selectivity is non-existent. It cares not how well something is done, only that it is done.

The burden of excellence falls to the fickle creature that is man, trapped in the maddening dissonance of enlightenment and primitive inclination. It is in that dissonance, steeped in the estuary of self-righteousness where the chilling waters of reason meet the warm sea of emotion that man finds purpose

May ever man know his rightful place as master of the institution nature has furnished of its own apathy.

[Blitzers]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It is man's sacred duty to best nature. What nature does well, man must do better. What nature does poorly, man must do worse. Only by outperforming nature at every turn can man know progress.

Nature is lazy, adopting strategies that are good enough. Its selectivity is non-existent. It cares not how well something is done, only that it is done.

The burden of excellence falls to the fickle creature that is man, trapped in the maddening dissonance of enlightenment and primitive inclination. It is in that dissonance, steeped in the estuary of self-righteousness where the chilling waters of reason meet the warm sea of emotion that man finds purpose

May ever man know his rightful place as master of the institution nature has furnished of its own apathy.

^^ if that's not just some heaping pile of bullshit, then I dunno what is. Please tell me your trolling and not going all esoteric on us, right?

[Blitzers]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nature is lazy, adopting strategies that are good enough. Its selectivity is non-existent. It cares not how well something is done, only that it is done.

Nature is lazy? In what context are you referring? What are you comparing nature to in order to attribute laziness as a trait? Or are you speaking of the nature of man?

Is it NOT natures intent to bring forth life? Is it NOT natures purpose to survive? What is nature's role in selecting winners and losers? What would Darwin say?

At what point in the evolutionary process are "we" no longer apart of nature? If we all evolved from a single celled organism is man part of nature?

Is a Beaver that builds a dam Lazy? Is the act of building the dam even considered nature? If that beaver had the intellectual ability and physical aptitude to build a dam with cement would he chose to, and would that be considered natural?

If a man builds a dam why is it not considered natural? Is the man and beaver's purpose for building the dam much different?

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am only acknowledging the hideous amalgamation of divergent ambitions by which man's nature is defined. We are all mad.

I don't understand your point here? So because we have differing ambitions trying to unify people you construe as being hideous, because it is in opposition to man's natural state?

Stalin and the Russian Army had far different ambitions during WWII but found a reason to ally with the U.S. and England to survive.

I'm the 1st person to say "forced amalgamation" is hideous, but the attempt to persuade others to join your cause even if they have different ambitions can always enlighten a man's senses.

Anyways please clarify your position if I have missed the mark here.