religion

[RobotElvis]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Have you never heard of a lungfish? Do you not know what an amphibian is?

Yes a lung fish. Isn't that a ohhhh man what do you call those things? Oh yeah fish! Has always been a fish, will always be a fish. Highly adapted to live out of water for a period if time, but still a fish.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by RobotElvis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Analogy raises a presumption against evolution. Analogy is not a demonstration. It is an illustration that strengthens and confirms other arguments. Both the science of mathematics and all physical laws must have come into being in an instant of time. Evolution is not God's usual method of creation.
MATHEMATICS.--There is no evolution in the science of mathematics. There is no change or growth or development. God is the author of all mathematical principles. The square described on the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle is equal to the sum of the squares described on the other two sides, because he made it so. The circumference of a circle is approximately 3.1416 times the diameter because he made it so. The wonderful calculations by logarithms, whether by the common system with a base of 10, or the Napierian system with a base of 2.718+ a decimal that never terminates, are possible and reliable only because God made them so. Think what great intelligence is required by the Napierian system, to raise a decimal that never terminates, to a decimal power that never terminates, in order to produce an integral number. Yet God has computed instantaneously every table of logarithms, and every other mathematical table,--no matter how difficult. Thus we have positive proof of the presence everywhere of a great intelligent Being, and we catch a glimpse of that mind that must be infinite. He created the whole system of mathematics, vast beyond our comprehension, at once. A part could not exist without the whole. No growth; no change; no evolution; no improvement, because the whole system was perfect from the first. Reasoning from analogy, is it not reasonable to say that the God who flashed upon the whole universe, the limitless system of mathematics in an instant, also created man as Moses said? Analogy supports the doctrine of the special creation of man.

We learn new things about math every day. Wtf are you even on?

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by RobotElvis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes a lung fish. Isn't that a ohhhh man what do you call those things? Oh yeah fish! Has always been a fish, will always be a fish. Highly adapted to live out of water for a period if time, but still a fish.

So you are saying amphibians are fish?

[RobotElvis]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Have you never heard of a lungfish? Do you not know what an amphibian is?

am·phib·i·an
amˈfibēən/
nounZOOLOGY
1.
a cold-blooded vertebrate animal of a class that comprises the frogs, toads, newts, and salamanders. They are distinguished by having an aquatic gill-breathing larval stage followed (typically) by a terrestrial lung-breathing adult stage.

fish1
fiSH/
noun
1.
a limbless cold-blooded vertebrate animal with gills and fins and living wholly in water.

[leewong]

Originally Posted by RobotElvis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Find me just one traditional species in the fossil record. That is, one species that went from one kind to another. Say for instance a fish that became a reptile. Just show me one.

You have billions of years of fossil record, that should mean trillions of fossils that exist. All you need is one.

I am not sure what you are asking for because your question is malformed. I will try to answer it anyway.

"Find me just one traditional species in the fossil record."
I am assuming you mean transitional. As I said before, every fossil we find was or had the potential to be a transitional fossil. You seem to think that one day a fish gave birth to a full blown lizard and I am suppose to show you that fossil. That isnt what evolution claims happens. You are asking for something that is nonsensical.

Transitional fossils > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...tional_fossils

[RobotElvis]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So you are saying amphibians are fish?

You do know a lung fish is not an amphibian right?

lung·fish
ˈləNGˌfiSH/
noun
an elongated freshwater fish with one or two sacs that function as lungs, enabling it to breathe air. It lives in poorly oxygenated water and can estivate in mud for long periods to survive drought.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by RobotElvis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You do know a lung fish is not an amphibian right?

lung·fish
ˈləNGˌfiSH/
noun
an elongated freshwater fish with one or two sacs that function as lungs, enabling it to breathe air. It lives in poorly oxygenated water and can estivate in mud for long periods to survive drought.

Your clearly evading that I meant that lung fish evolved into an amphibious...
...you know it's just easier to call you stupid.

[paulgiamatti]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wtf are you even on?

Creationism.

[RobotElvis]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your clearly evading that I meant that lung fish evolved into an amphibious...
...you know it's just easier to call you stupid.

And so your proof for that is?????

Here's my proof that it did not evolve into an amphibian.

Buy a plain ticket to Africa, find a guide to take you into the bush.
Ask him to find point you to the nearest lungfish. Find the lungfish.
Realize that lungfish still exist.
Look around for the fossils that show lungfish becoming amphibians.
Find none, return home.

[Glenzig]

Yall can't hang with the RobotElvis. Calling him a stupid creationist as he completely dismantles evolution with cold hard science. All the while you are professing your faith that science will find the answer one day. One day. Eventually we'll have all the answers. One day.