Science Admits They Made Up Everything About the Big Bang

[Langrisserx]

Eat Fuck.

[Kagatob]

Current assumed limits?

[Langrisserx]

From your Dick Tip to your Pie Hole as far as you know

[runlvlzero]

i f y o u c a n r e a d t h i s y o u b r o u g h t i t i n t o b e i n g o u t o f t h e q u a n t u m f o a m b e c a u s e y o u a r e t h e c r e a t o r a n d i f y o u w a n t y o u c a n c r e a t e b i g b a n g s a n d h a w k i n g r a d i a t i o n . . .

o b l i g a t o r y X K C D

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

G O O D N I G H T N E R D S

[radditsu]

Hbb post but more boring.

[Langrisserx]

^ smartest post in thread... boring as shit for sure. fun comic though

[Shaakglith12194]

Originally Posted by r00t [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus

"Most modern scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed, but scholars differ on the historicity of specific episodes described in the Biblical accounts of Jesus, and the only two events subject to "almost universal assent" are that Jesus was baptized by John the Baptist and was crucified by the order of the Roman Prefect Pontius Pilate."

Almost universal assent. Note how that wikipedia article never once says anything about proof of existence. In fact, the whole article seems to state that this entire "Historicity of Jesus" is done by people who don't doubt that he existed already and work from that assumption. Here's something worth mentioning though:

""Christ myth theory" is an umbrella term that applies to a range of arguments that question the existence of Jesus as described in the Christian gospels. The theory that Jesus never existed at all has support from a small minority of modern scholars."

Still waiting for you to point me to any reliable account of history taken from the christian bible.

[Langrisserx]

christianity is a mashup of religions in order to overtake them without violence and because they are unorginal.

its all astro-theological allegory plain as day.

the stars look different from different places on earth.

man is stupid and fearful.

ad nauseum

[Sadre Spinegnawer]

Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm glad you know the exact limits of our knowledge. I bet there was an ancient Greek version of you that said we'd never know why the stars are in the sky. We still are fairly infantile in our understanding of our universe. Hell, we haven't managed to get a human farther than 0.0000000000000000000003125% of the way to the edge of the observable universe. Making claims about the limits of our knowledge seems somewhat premature.

You did not understand my post. It went over your head.

You cannot derive knowledge about what is outside a system of which one is a member.

Imagine I tell you there is a color no human being has ever seen, and more specifically, it cannot ever be observed because its definition is, "a color outside of the system of color." What color is it? An impossible question, by definition.

The same thing happens when you try to think where the universe came from. If you point me to the big bang, or even God, if you so choose, that is part of the universe. What the question means is, what existed prior to the universe?

But by definition one cannot know. You cannot know something that is outside the system from which one is gathering information.

And this is why questions of ultimate origins (and ends) are unanswerable. We only know the thing that is. It is vast, has a history, has laws, has processes, has end states (heat death).

But we do not know why it is here in the first place. never will.

[Langrisserx]

exactly... we would be satisfied with the how.


the Why is irrelevant at this point and possibly for all time.


well put. there is hope yet.