![]() |
|
View Poll Results: See thread title | |||
Bard |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
37 | 34.91% |
Ranger |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
39 | 36.79% |
Other (please give your faulty reasoning) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
23 | 21.70% |
Keep twin towers as is. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 12.26% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 106. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
Alleriah, are you going balls to the wall DPS when you're not Trueshotting on raids? I know I turned off auto-attack every now and then to make sure I didn't out-aggro the MT.
__________________
Another witty, informative, and/or retarded post by:
![]() "You know you done fucked up when Yendor gives you raid commentary." - Tiggles | |||
|
#2
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
More seriously, I'm with Astuce. It's clearly bard who gets 252 defense, plate armor, infinite manaless snap aggro, and gives the cleric 25-35% mana per tick. I took my bard to 52 mostly as a tank and it's pretty disgustingly good. The only question is whether the bard is more effective as a tank or puller. One of the most interesting parts of playing on TAKP was chatting to people with different stereotypes. People really overrate pure melee here I think. They are great for raiding, but pretty average while leveling. | |||
|
#3
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
I surmise part of the problem with Bards might be what I mentioned previous: They're wildly inconsistent in terms of quality, and it's a good bet a lot of folks have rarely or never seen a good one. The gap between a mediocre Bard and a good one is larger than for nearly any other class. Danth | |||
|
#4
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
Last edited by elwing; 03-22-2019 at 10:30 AM..
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
![]() I want more tales of Paladins saving the day, best part of this thread by far.
| ||
|
#6
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
"Why Paladin is the best class" https://youtu.be/GpSKPq3mTHM Its not specific P99 but if anyone wants inspiration listen to this guy for 6 minutes | |||
|
#7
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
However, I do feel like it's a bit of a false dilemma: it's an offensively oriented class joining a defensively oriented group. A Paladin would be much happier if the Shaman was swapped for a Mage or Necromancer or just another Rogue. And in general full groups are boring. What if we cut the Shaman and just go Enchanter/Cleric/Tank? Suddenly this calculation gets a lot more interesting. The Enchanter won't have enough mana to cc, slow every mob, and still charm a boss pet. As far as joining this trio it depends a lot on how critical the splits are. In a tough area, probably SK > MNK > WAR > PAL > BRD > RNG. In an easier area, maybe BRD > PAL > WAR > SK > RNG > MNK. | |||
Last edited by Raev; 03-22-2019 at 11:02 AM..
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
![]() lol at people saying ranger
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxx View Post I tried my hand at rotating with the casuals. It was at this point I decided to no longer be kind to the casuals as they have extreme short term memory. They did this to themselves, unfortunately. Quote: Originally Posted by Maner View Post No one in A/A cares that you aren't getting pixels. In fact after the last suspension wave the attitude is to stop letting the casual guilds get anything even remotely of value. | ||
|
#9
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Another witty, informative, and/or retarded post by:
![]() "You know you done fucked up when Yendor gives you raid commentary." - Tiggles | |||
|
#10
|
|||
|
![]() https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=108428
See this in defense of the pally post. Classic. | ||
|
![]() |
|
|