Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

View Poll Results: See thread title
Bard 37 34.91%
Ranger 39 36.79%
Other (please give your faulty reasoning) 23 21.70%
Keep twin towers as is. 13 12.26%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 106. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-22-2019, 08:44 PM
YendorLootmonkey YendorLootmonkey is offline
Planar Protector

YendorLootmonkey's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Surefall Glade
Posts: 2,203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No, rangers are just mediocre dps. I parse groups. I parse raids. Rangers are just not that good at dps. Great class, but not stellar dps. DPS for ranger is solidly middle of the road.
Olay, but are you parsing a bunch of rangers walking on eggshells trying not to take aggro away from a warrior and fucking the entire raid, or are you parsing rangers purposely tanking things and throwing caution to the wind?

Alleriah, are you going balls to the wall DPS when you're not Trueshotting on raids? I know I turned off auto-attack every now and then to make sure I didn't out-aggro the MT.
__________________
Another witty, informative, and/or retarded post by:

"You know you done fucked up when Yendor gives you raid commentary." - Tiggles
  #2  
Old 03-22-2019, 09:14 AM
Raev Raev is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zarza
Enchanter is best tanker in group contents if you geared
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

More seriously, I'm with Astuce. It's clearly bard who gets 252 defense, plate armor, infinite manaless snap aggro, and gives the cleric 25-35% mana per tick. I took my bard to 52 mostly as a tank and it's pretty disgustingly good. The only question is whether the bard is more effective as a tank or puller.

One of the most interesting parts of playing on TAKP was chatting to people with different stereotypes. People really overrate pure melee here I think. They are great for raiding, but pretty average while leveling.
  #3  
Old 03-22-2019, 10:07 AM
Danth Danth is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
More seriously, I'm with Astuce. It's clearly bard who gets 252 defense, plate armor, infinite manaless snap aggro, and gives the cleric 25-35% mana per tick. I took my bard to 52 mostly as a tank and it's pretty disgustingly good. The only question is whether the bard is more effective as a tank or puller.
Mana-less aggro is an advantage that should not be overlooked. Any of the other hybrid classes have to significantly curtail their spellcasting activity in a chain-pulling environment with little or no time to sit, especially if outside mana regeneration is not present.

I surmise part of the problem with Bards might be what I mentioned previous: They're wildly inconsistent in terms of quality, and it's a good bet a lot of folks have rarely or never seen a good one. The gap between a mediocre Bard and a good one is larger than for nearly any other class.

Danth
  #4  
Old 03-22-2019, 10:24 AM
elwing elwing is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,194
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Mana-less aggro is an advantage that should not be overlooked. Any of the other hybrid classes have to significantly curtail their spellcasting activity in a chain-pulling environment with little or no time to sit, especially if outside mana regeneration is not present.
Valid concern... But as a sk, at 10mana a pop for DC, I am mana challenged for lot of things but not for agro... If I just do agro I can tank all the day without med nor C...
Last edited by elwing; 03-22-2019 at 10:30 AM..
  #5  
Old 03-22-2019, 10:50 AM
FatherSioux FatherSioux is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 1,017
Default

I want more tales of Paladins saving the day, best part of this thread by far.
  #6  
Old 03-22-2019, 10:57 AM
Cen Cen is offline
Planar Protector

Cen's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 2,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatherSioux [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I want more tales of Paladins saving the day, best part of this thread by far.
On that note:

"Why Paladin is the best class"
https://youtu.be/GpSKPq3mTHM

Its not specific P99 but if anyone wants inspiration listen to this guy for 6 minutes
__________________
  #7  
Old 03-22-2019, 10:58 AM
Raev Raev is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alleriah
Tanking group content in Classic EverQuest is trivial, therefore the highest dps class with snap aggro, Ranger, wins
So I'm definitely on board with this. If you have an Enchanter, Cleric, and Shaman backing you up, literally any class can tank. Rangers will outdamage all of the other hybrids while still keeping the group smooth.

However, I do feel like it's a bit of a false dilemma: it's an offensively oriented class joining a defensively oriented group. A Paladin would be much happier if the Shaman was swapped for a Mage or Necromancer or just another Rogue. And in general full groups are boring.

What if we cut the Shaman and just go Enchanter/Cleric/Tank? Suddenly this calculation gets a lot more interesting. The Enchanter won't have enough mana to cc, slow every mob, and still charm a boss pet. As far as joining this trio it depends a lot on how critical the splits are. In a tough area, probably SK > MNK > WAR > PAL > BRD > RNG. In an easier area, maybe BRD > PAL > WAR > SK > RNG > MNK.
Last edited by Raev; 03-22-2019 at 11:02 AM..
  #8  
Old 03-22-2019, 11:18 AM
aaezil aaezil is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,762
Default

lol at people saying ranger
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxx View Post
I tried my hand at rotating with the casuals.
It was at this point I decided to no longer be kind to the casuals as they have extreme short term memory. They did this to themselves, unfortunately.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maner View Post
No one in A/A cares that you aren't getting pixels. In fact after the last suspension wave the attitude is to stop letting the casual guilds get anything even remotely of value.
  #9  
Old 03-22-2019, 12:48 PM
YendorLootmonkey YendorLootmonkey is offline
Planar Protector

YendorLootmonkey's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Surefall Glade
Posts: 2,203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aaezil [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
lol at people saying ranger
Lol at people ignoring mob dying faster = less damage taken overall.
__________________
Another witty, informative, and/or retarded post by:

"You know you done fucked up when Yendor gives you raid commentary." - Tiggles
  #10  
Old 03-22-2019, 11:25 AM
Crede Crede is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,107
Default

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=108428

See this in defense of the pally post. Classic.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.